Assessing Cost-Effective Materials for Multi-Functional Crutches: an Integrated MCDM Framework

Material selection significantly impacts crutch performance and durability, posing challenges due to various criteria and complex decision-making in engineering design. This study introduces an innovative methodology for evaluating material options in developing cost-effective multifunctional crutches. Integrating the CRITIC method for factor weighting, MARCOS for alternative measurement and ranking, and TOPSIS for preference ranking, the framework assesses seven potential materials across ten criteria. Key findings highlight cost, adjustability, and density as critical factors, with aluminium identified as the optimal frame material followed by fiberglass, striking a balance between attributes. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of this approach, providing valuable insights for material selection in engineering systems and assistive technology design, enhancing crutch performance and user satisfaction. This novel approach combines established decision-making techniques, enhancing the efficiency of material selection processes for crutch design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2025.152537
Citations
1
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Cost-Effective Materials for Multi-Functional Crutches: an Integrated MCDM Framework

Mangesh Joshi
1 citations
Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
BIM and Construction Integration
1.01
article

Assessing Cost-Effective Materials for Multi-Functional Crutches: an Integrated MCDM Framework

Mangesh Joshi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Material selection significantly impacts crutch performance and durability, posing challenges due to various criteria and complex decision-making in engineering design. This study introduces an innovative methodology for evaluating material options in developing cost-effective multifunctional crutches. Integrating the CRITIC method for factor weighting, MARCOS for alternative measurement and ranking, and TOPSIS for preference ranking, the framework assesses seven potential materials across ten criteria. Key findings highlight cost, adjustability, and density as critical factors, with aluminium identified as the optimal frame material followed by fiberglass, striking a balance between attributes. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of this approach, providing valuable insights for material selection in engineering systems and assistive technology design, enhancing crutch performance and user satisfaction. This novel approach combines established decision-making techniques, enhancing the efficiency of material selection processes for crutch design.

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
BIM and Construction Integration
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Cost-Effective Materials for Multi-Functional Crutches: an Integrated MCDM Framework — Mangesh Joshi · Archives of Metallurgy and Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS