Comparative Analysis of Attention Mechanisms in U-Net Variants for Breast Cancer Image Segmentation

Accurate segmentation of breast cancer images is crucial for effective detection and treatment. This work evaluates the efficacy of various Attention U-Net models with different attention mechanisms, including SE (Squeeze-and-Excitation) blocks and Swish activation functions, for breast cancer image segmentation. We assessed these models using several metrics: IoU, precision, recall, F1 score, MAE, dice coefficient, and specificity. The SE-Swish U-Net variant achieved the highest performance metrics, with a mean IoU of 77.71%, precision of 78.6%, recall of 73.5%, F1 score of 75.9%, dice coefficient of 75.91%, and specificity of 96.70%. The SE-Swish model also demonstrated superior accuracy and efficiency compared to other variants, though it required longer training and execution times. Qualitative analysis supported the SE-Swish model’s ability to handle complex lesion borders and low-contrast areas. This work highlights how advanced attention mechanisms in U-Net architectures can enhance breast cancer image segmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/gcat62922.2024.10923910
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Attention Mechanisms in U-Net Variants for Breast Cancer Image Segmentation

S Anusuya, G. Victo Sudha George
2 citations
AI in cancer detection
0.69
article

Comparative Analysis of Attention Mechanisms in U-Net Variants for Breast Cancer Image Segmentation

S Anusuya, G. Victo Sudha George
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of breast cancer images is crucial for effective detection and treatment. This work evaluates the efficacy of various Attention U-Net models with different attention mechanisms, including SE (Squeeze-and-Excitation) blocks and Swish activation functions, for breast cancer image segmentation. We assessed these models using several metrics: IoU, precision, recall, F1 score, MAE, dice coefficient, and specificity. The SE-Swish U-Net variant achieved the highest performance metrics, with a mean IoU of 77.71%, precision of 78.6%, recall of 73.5%, F1 score of 75.9%, dice coefficient of 75.91%, and specificity of 96.70%. The SE-Swish model also demonstrated superior accuracy and efficiency compared to other variants, though it required longer training and execution times. Qualitative analysis supported the SE-Swish model’s ability to handle complex lesion borders and low-contrast areas. This work highlights how advanced attention mechanisms in U-Net architectures can enhance breast cancer image segmentation.

St. Peter's Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
AI in cancer detection
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.