Why to Fail Fast and Often: A Strategy for OT Safety and Security Evaluation

As the Operational Technology (OT) environment becomes increasingly interconnected and integrates diverse technologies, traditional models often struggle to accurately represent the complex interactions and dependencies of the underlying systems. Factors like changes in operational conditions, software updates, and the introduction of new devices can significantly impact the system’s risk profile. This paper presents a methodology to bridge the gap between manual and automated safety and security requirements in Industry 4.0 OT environments. First, a meta-model is developed to capture OT infrastructure components and relationships. This is then transformed into a C#-based GUI, enabling tasks like network scanning, application and interface identification, and AI-powered data extraction. Next, compliance checks and risk assessments are conducted using standards such as IEC 62443-3-3 and methods like LOPA, SEFR (HAZID), STRIDE, and DREAD. Finally, the data is converted into system models (e.g., OWL, AutomationML) for visualization. This approach reduces complexity and time by 83.72%, though it faces challenges like platform dependency and resource constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3553011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why to Fail Fast and Often: A Strategy for OT Safety and Security Evaluation

Mukund Bhole, Wolfgang Kästner, Thilo Sauter, Sabrina Semper
1 citations
IEEE Access
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
1.21
article

Why to Fail Fast and Often: A Strategy for OT Safety and Security Evaluation

Mukund Bhole, Wolfgang Kästner, Thilo Sauter, Sabrina Semper
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As the Operational Technology (OT) environment becomes increasingly interconnected and integrates diverse technologies, traditional models often struggle to accurately represent the complex interactions and dependencies of the underlying systems. Factors like changes in operational conditions, software updates, and the introduction of new devices can significantly impact the system’s risk profile. This paper presents a methodology to bridge the gap between manual and automated safety and security requirements in Industry 4.0 OT environments. First, a meta-model is developed to capture OT infrastructure components and relationships. This is then transformed into a C#-based GUI, enabling tasks like network scanning, application and interface identification, and AI-powered data extraction. Next, compliance checks and risk assessments are conducted using standards such as IEC 62443-3-3 and methods like LOPA, SEFR (HAZID), STRIDE, and DREAD. Finally, the data is converted into system models (e.g., OWL, AutomationML) for visualization. This approach reduces complexity and time by 83.72%, though it faces challenges like platform dependency and resource constraints.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), TU Wien (AT)
Technische Universität Wien Bibliothek
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.