Examining the Impact of Fingerprint Vector Size on Similarity Determination and Clustering Performance of a Pattern-Based Similarity Metric

The correlation-based context similarity coefficient (CSC) metric is a pattern-based fingerprint similarity metric that has gained interest in fingerprint database clustering operations. The performance of the traditional distance-based metric in fingerprint vector similarity determination has been known to be influenced by the size of the fingerprint vector. However, as for the correlation-based CSC metric, there is no comprehensive research on how fingerprint vector size affects its performance in similarity determination and subsequently clustering performance. As such, this paper examines the impact of fingerprint vector size on the similarity determination performance of the correlation-based CSC metric with the k-medoids algorithm employed for clustering. The analysis is performed across four synthetic and two experimentally generated fingerprint databases with varying fingerprint vector sizes. The impact analysis is carried out with the clustering algorithm set to generate K <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\in $ </tex-math></inline-formula> [3, 5] clusters. Additionally, the results are compared against three distance-based metrics: squared Euclidean, Manhattan, and cosine. With silhouette score as the clustering performance metric, the simulation result shows that the size of the fingerprint vector influences the similarity determination performance of the correlation-based CSC metric. Additionally, the number of clusters in which the clustering algorithm is set to generate also contributes to how the correlation-based CSC metric performs in similarity determination. The similarity determination time complexity of the correlation-based CSC metric increases with fingerprint vector size, making efficient clustering more challenging as fingerprint vector sizes increase. For optimal performance, the correlation-based CSC metric is recommended for us as a similarity metric on a database with a fingerprint vector size of N <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\le 4$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and a clustering algorithm configured to generate no more than 3 clusters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3553510
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biometric Identification and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Impact of Fingerprint Vector Size on Similarity Determination and Clustering Performance of a Pattern-Based Similarity Metric

Filip Malý, Pavel Pražák, Abdulmalik Shehu Yaro
1 citations
IEEE Access
Biometric Identification and Security
1.49
article

Examining the Impact of Fingerprint Vector Size on Similarity Determination and Clustering Performance of a Pattern-Based Similarity Metric

Filip Malý, Pavel Pražák, Abdulmalik Shehu Yaro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The correlation-based context similarity coefficient (CSC) metric is a pattern-based fingerprint similarity metric that has gained interest in fingerprint database clustering operations. The performance of the traditional distance-based metric in fingerprint vector similarity determination has been known to be influenced by the size of the fingerprint vector. However, as for the correlation-based CSC metric, there is no comprehensive research on how fingerprint vector size affects its performance in similarity determination and subsequently clustering performance. As such, this paper examines the impact of fingerprint vector size on the similarity determination performance of the correlation-based CSC metric with the k-medoids algorithm employed for clustering. The analysis is performed across four synthetic and two experimentally generated fingerprint databases with varying fingerprint vector sizes. The impact analysis is carried out with the clustering algorithm set to generate K <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\in $ </tex-math></inline-formula> [3, 5] clusters. Additionally, the results are compared against three distance-based metrics: squared Euclidean, Manhattan, and cosine. With silhouette score as the clustering performance metric, the simulation result shows that the size of the fingerprint vector influences the similarity determination performance of the correlation-based CSC metric. Additionally, the number of clusters in which the clustering algorithm is set to generate also contributes to how the correlation-based CSC metric performs in similarity determination. The similarity determination time complexity of the correlation-based CSC metric increases with fingerprint vector size, making efficient clustering more challenging as fingerprint vector sizes increase. For optimal performance, the correlation-based CSC metric is recommended for us as a similarity metric on a database with a fingerprint vector size of N <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\le 4$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and a clustering algorithm configured to generate no more than 3 clusters.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Hradec Králové (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Biometric Identification and Security
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.