Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment Frameworks for Group-Based Assessment in Higher Institutions of Learning

This study assesses the effectiveness of online peer assessment frameworks in higher institutions of learning through a quantitative analysis. The research explores the relationships between several dimensions of online peer assessment, comprising participant engagement, perceived challenges, and the effectiveness of online collaborative tools. Employing a sample of 154 participants, data were collected via surveys, and statistical methods, including factor analysis, t-tests, and regression analysis, were applied to examine the results. The findings indicate a generally positive perception of online peer assessment, with significant correlations between technical support and user satisfaction. The effects of these results highlight the need for higher institutions of learning to address technical challenges and improve support mechanisms to improve the effectiveness of online peer assessment frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS)
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v5i1.1768
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment Frameworks for Group-Based Assessment in Higher Institutions of Learning

Simon Kawuma, Deborah Natumanya, Job Kalema, Jane Katusiime
Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment Frameworks for Group-Based Assessment in Higher Institutions of Learning

Simon Kawuma, Deborah Natumanya, Job Kalema, Jane Katusiime
article en

Abstract

This study assesses the effectiveness of online peer assessment frameworks in higher institutions of learning through a quantitative analysis. The research explores the relationships between several dimensions of online peer assessment, comprising participant engagement, perceived challenges, and the effectiveness of online collaborative tools. Employing a sample of 154 participants, data were collected via surveys, and statistical methods, including factor analysis, t-tests, and regression analysis, were applied to examine the results. The findings indicate a generally positive perception of online peer assessment, with significant correlations between technical support and user satisfaction. The effects of these results highlight the need for higher institutions of learning to address technical challenges and improve support mechanisms to improve the effectiveness of online peer assessment frameworks.

Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS)Vol. 5(1)
Mbarara University of Science and Technology (UG)
International Islamic University Malaysia, Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.