Influence of durability properties on life-cycle carbon reduction of low-carbon mortar with similar compressive strength

The imperative for carbon reduction in the construction industry is gaining momentum. A pivotal strategy in this endeavor is the adoption of low-carbon cementitious materials and the enhancement of concrete structures' service life. The chloride-induced corrosion and water ingress in reinforced concrete is a pervasive issue, often resulting in premature structural failure and substantial economic loss. This study focuses on four low-carbon cementitious materials: calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSA), CO 2 cured calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSA-C), alkali-activated slag (AAS), and limestone calcined clay cement (LC 3 ). Different types of low-carbon mortars with similar compressive strength were used for mercury intrusion porosimetry, hydration phase analysis, chloride ion diffusion, and water permeability tests. The results reveal that AAS and LC 3 possess superior or similar chloride diffusion and water permeation resistance compared with Portland cement (PC) mortar. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon emission analyses show that AAS and LC 3 produce markedly lower carbon emissions during production compared to PC. The expected repair time from the chloride ion diffusivity and water permeability suggests that LC 3 and AAS have extended repair time and reduced annual carbon emissions, underscoring their viability as PC alternatives. It is highlighted that the annual carbonation emissions taking concrete durability into consideration is a more appropriate index for assessing the environmental performance of low-carbon cementitious materials, rather than the total carbon emissions. • Durability of four low-carbon concrete under same strength was investigated. • CO 2 curing enhances pore structure and strength of CSA mortar. • LC 3 mortar has much lower chloride diffusivity and moderate water permeability. • AAS has the lowest total carbon emission from concrete production. • LC 3 and AAS have lower annual carbon emissions than PC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04558
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of durability properties on life-cycle carbon reduction of low-carbon mortar with similar compressive strength

Chuanqing Fu, Kuan Lu, Zhilu Jiang, Yifeng Ling et al.
2 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
article

Influence of durability properties on life-cycle carbon reduction of low-carbon mortar with similar compressive strength

Chuanqing Fu, Kuan Lu, Zhilu Jiang, Yifeng Ling, Biqin Dong, Mok Limdevit
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The imperative for carbon reduction in the construction industry is gaining momentum. A pivotal strategy in this endeavor is the adoption of low-carbon cementitious materials and the enhancement of concrete structures' service life. The chloride-induced corrosion and water ingress in reinforced concrete is a pervasive issue, often resulting in premature structural failure and substantial economic loss. This study focuses on four low-carbon cementitious materials: calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSA), CO 2 cured calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSA-C), alkali-activated slag (AAS), and limestone calcined clay cement (LC 3 ). Different types of low-carbon mortars with similar compressive strength were used for mercury intrusion porosimetry, hydration phase analysis, chloride ion diffusion, and water permeability tests. The results reveal that AAS and LC 3 possess superior or similar chloride diffusion and water permeation resistance compared with Portland cement (PC) mortar. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon emission analyses show that AAS and LC 3 produce markedly lower carbon emissions during production compared to PC. The expected repair time from the chloride ion diffusivity and water permeability suggests that LC 3 and AAS have extended repair time and reduced annual carbon emissions, underscoring their viability as PC alternatives. It is highlighted that the annual carbonation emissions taking concrete durability into consideration is a more appropriate index for assessing the environmental performance of low-carbon cementitious materials, rather than the total carbon emissions. • Durability of four low-carbon concrete under same strength was investigated. • CO 2 curing enhances pore structure and strength of CSA mortar. • LC 3 mortar has much lower chloride diffusivity and moderate water permeability. • AAS has the lowest total carbon emission from concrete production. • LC 3 and AAS have lower annual carbon emissions than PC.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 22
Shandong University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN), Shandong Transportation Research Institute (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.