The Influence of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations on Regional Economic Growth

The article examines the impact on regional economic growth from intraregional fiscal decentralization and the structure of regional financial assistance to local public budgets. For this purpose, a panel regression was arrived at using the data from Russia’s regions for 2011–2021 or for 2015– 2021. The resulting calculations demonstrate that the relationship between the degree of decentralization of expenditures and the rate of economic growth is ∩-shaped. While an increase in the decentralization of expenditures can have a positive effect on economic growth, that holds true only for those regions in which the initial level of decentralized expenditures is significantly below 30%. However, there is no significant relationship between the degree of decentralization of taxation and the rate of economic growth. The impact on GRP growth of individual instruments for providing financial assistance to local budgets turned out to be different for wealthier and low-income regions. In low-income regions, regional financial assistance has a negative effect on economic growth; that is, economic growth in such regions should be fostered by increasing the revenue of the local budgets (or revenue base). In addition, for low-income regions, targeted financial assistance tends to dampen economic growth; therefore, non-targeted financial assistance to such regions is preferable. Capital subsidies accelerate economic growth, and this effect is more pronounced in wealthier regions. However, neither increasing tax sharing by a few percentage points, nor an overall increase in the level of tax decentralization, showed a significant impact on economic growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Policy
Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-1-56-83
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations on Regional Economic Growth

Alexander Deryugin, Irina Filippova, Igor Arlashkin
Economic Policy
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

The Influence of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations on Regional Economic Growth

Alexander Deryugin, Irina Filippova, Igor Arlashkin
article en

Abstract

The article examines the impact on regional economic growth from intraregional fiscal decentralization and the structure of regional financial assistance to local public budgets. For this purpose, a panel regression was arrived at using the data from Russia’s regions for 2011–2021 or for 2015– 2021. The resulting calculations demonstrate that the relationship between the degree of decentralization of expenditures and the rate of economic growth is ∩-shaped. While an increase in the decentralization of expenditures can have a positive effect on economic growth, that holds true only for those regions in which the initial level of decentralized expenditures is significantly below 30%. However, there is no significant relationship between the degree of decentralization of taxation and the rate of economic growth. The impact on GRP growth of individual instruments for providing financial assistance to local budgets turned out to be different for wealthier and low-income regions. In low-income regions, regional financial assistance has a negative effect on economic growth; that is, economic growth in such regions should be fostered by increasing the revenue of the local budgets (or revenue base). In addition, for low-income regions, targeted financial assistance tends to dampen economic growth; therefore, non-targeted financial assistance to such regions is preferable. Capital subsidies accelerate economic growth, and this effect is more pronounced in wealthier regions. However, neither increasing tax sharing by a few percentage points, nor an overall increase in the level of tax decentralization, showed a significant impact on economic growth.

Economic PolicyVol. 20(1)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.