Measuring Interoperability Within NATO: Adapted Off-the-Shelf or Bespoke Solution?

Despite decades of work on interoperability, NATO Allies cannot measure, assess, and build upon it fully and accurately. The lack of agreed formats or standards for collection, management, and the communication of findings have prevented the Allies from developing common interoperability measurement and assessment tools. Nonetheless, NATO could adopt extant standards, methodologies, processes, or tools to achieve its interoperability objectives. Testing this notion through use cases, the authors identify practical and conceptual hurdles to adopting an off-the-shelf solution. They conclude that the Alliance may need to create assessment standards, methodologies, processes, and tools from scratch, despite the difficulties of doing so.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3331
Primary Topic
Military Strategy and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Interoperability Within NATO: Adapted Off-the-Shelf or Bespoke Solution?

John R. Deni, M. MacLeod, Adrian B. Jones, Sarah E. Stewart et al.
The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters
Military Strategy and Technology
article

Measuring Interoperability Within NATO: Adapted Off-the-Shelf or Bespoke Solution?

John R. Deni, M. MacLeod, Adrian B. Jones, Sarah E. Stewart, Katherine M. Banko
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of work on interoperability, NATO Allies cannot measure, assess, and build upon it fully and accurately. The lack of agreed formats or standards for collection, management, and the communication of findings have prevented the Allies from developing common interoperability measurement and assessment tools. Nonetheless, NATO could adopt extant standards, methodologies, processes, or tools to achieve its interoperability objectives. Testing this notion through use cases, the authors identify practical and conceptual hurdles to adopting an off-the-shelf solution. They conclude that the Alliance may need to create assessment standards, methodologies, processes, and tools from scratch, despite the difficulties of doing so.

The US Army War College Quarterly ParametersVol. 55(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Military Strategy and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.