Cinephile Culture as Infrastructure

Cinephilia in Hong Kong has served as a vital site for cultural mobilization and political engagement, inviting participation in various cinematic forms to generate new questions about the media as such. Cinephile culture played a pivotal role in reorienting and cultivating alternative mediascapes and intellectual networks in Hong Kong from the 1960s to the 1980s, a period defined by colonial governance and cultural Cold War. Hong Kong’s cinephile culture should be regarded as an “infrastructure,” defined in terms of discursive-material relationships that converge in the production, reception, and circulation of cinema. Drawing from the framework of critical infrastructure studies, this article conceives cinephilia in terms of material culture and processes of sociotechnical mediation, identifying vital junctures where film culture comes into being by means of the technological apparatus of cinema, the agency of human and nonhuman beings (including amateur creators, film critics, cameras, publications, and physical sites), and the intricate interactions between them.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Film Quarterly
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2025.78.3.23
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cinephile Culture as Infrastructure

Emilie Sin-yi Choi
Film Quarterly
Cinema and Media Studies
article

Cinephile Culture as Infrastructure

Emilie Sin-yi Choi
article en

Abstract

Cinephilia in Hong Kong has served as a vital site for cultural mobilization and political engagement, inviting participation in various cinematic forms to generate new questions about the media as such. Cinephile culture played a pivotal role in reorienting and cultivating alternative mediascapes and intellectual networks in Hong Kong from the 1960s to the 1980s, a period defined by colonial governance and cultural Cold War. Hong Kong’s cinephile culture should be regarded as an “infrastructure,” defined in terms of discursive-material relationships that converge in the production, reception, and circulation of cinema. Drawing from the framework of critical infrastructure studies, this article conceives cinephilia in terms of material culture and processes of sociotechnical mediation, identifying vital junctures where film culture comes into being by means of the technological apparatus of cinema, the agency of human and nonhuman beings (including amateur creators, film critics, cameras, publications, and physical sites), and the intricate interactions between them.

Film QuarterlyVol. 78(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.