Professionals navigating continuous movements: interpreting architects’ agency and legitimization of BIM and reuse roles

While technological advancements in BIM and material reuse have been widely studied, less attention has been given to the behavioral and cultural shifts necessary for their successful implementation. Architectural professionals are expected to acquire new skills and redefine their roles to align with these trends. Yet, little is known about how architects perceive and navigate these institutional changes. Using a multi-levelled institutional lens, the research presented in this paper addresses this gap by exploring how architects perceive and navigate their institutional context, including the movements (digitalization and sustainabilization), and legitimize their purposive actions in adapting their professional roles toward BIM and reuse. Through reflections from 15 architects (with seven narratives in particular focus), the study unpacks perceptions of legitimacy and how these influence professional behavior and decision-making. An intertextual narrative analysis reveals how the motivation to adopt BIM and reuse is closely linked to maintaining the stability of the professional institution. The findings show how changes related to BIM and reuse may conflict with professionals’ values and self-perceptions, affecting the potential for expected advancements in digitalization and sustainability. This study enhances the understanding of micro-level processes driving institutional change in the construction industry by uncovering underlying motives and intentions behind architects’ actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architectural Engineering and Design Management
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2025.2480836
Citations
2
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professionals navigating continuous movements: interpreting architects’ agency and legitimization of BIM and reuse roles

Susanne Engström, Mathilda Norell
2 citations
Architectural Engineering and Design Management
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
article

Professionals navigating continuous movements: interpreting architects’ agency and legitimization of BIM and reuse roles

Susanne Engström, Mathilda Norell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While technological advancements in BIM and material reuse have been widely studied, less attention has been given to the behavioral and cultural shifts necessary for their successful implementation. Architectural professionals are expected to acquire new skills and redefine their roles to align with these trends. Yet, little is known about how architects perceive and navigate these institutional changes. Using a multi-levelled institutional lens, the research presented in this paper addresses this gap by exploring how architects perceive and navigate their institutional context, including the movements (digitalization and sustainabilization), and legitimize their purposive actions in adapting their professional roles toward BIM and reuse. Through reflections from 15 architects (with seven narratives in particular focus), the study unpacks perceptions of legitimacy and how these influence professional behavior and decision-making. An intertextual narrative analysis reveals how the motivation to adopt BIM and reuse is closely linked to maintaining the stability of the professional institution. The findings show how changes related to BIM and reuse may conflict with professionals’ values and self-perceptions, affecting the potential for expected advancements in digitalization and sustainability. This study enhances the understanding of micro-level processes driving institutional change in the construction industry by uncovering underlying motives and intentions behind architects’ actions.

Architectural Engineering and Design Management
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.