Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: Acknowledging Non-Optimization and Remedying Mismodeling

There has been recent proliferation of entrepreneurship theorizing involving the true uncertainty of a system—most often labeled as Knightian. This has been noted in both individual papers and in the main partial theories that attempt to explain entrepreneurial activity more holistically. We detect a danger in this work involving such true uncertainty—defined by the condition that decisions plagued by it are non-optimizable by every interested party. It is that all the recent theorizing misinterprets that uncertainty in one of two ways: with a logical contradiction (i.e., that the non-optimizable is actually optimizable); or with a misrepresentation (i.e., that an uncertainty consisting of a knowable unknown that can be made known through known means by the time the decision must be made is true). Our concern is that such misinterpretations create unnecessary costs to academics and practitioners who are struggling to define the system they are managing. We explain this concern and its costs, detail the underlying premises, illustrate it with several examples, and then offer various specific directions to improve the theorizing over such uncertainty in entrepreneurship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030214
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: Acknowledging Non-Optimization and Remedying Mismodeling

Richard J. Arend
1 citations
Systems
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
article

Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: Acknowledging Non-Optimization and Remedying Mismodeling

Richard J. Arend
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been recent proliferation of entrepreneurship theorizing involving the true uncertainty of a system—most often labeled as Knightian. This has been noted in both individual papers and in the main partial theories that attempt to explain entrepreneurial activity more holistically. We detect a danger in this work involving such true uncertainty—defined by the condition that decisions plagued by it are non-optimizable by every interested party. It is that all the recent theorizing misinterprets that uncertainty in one of two ways: with a logical contradiction (i.e., that the non-optimizable is actually optimizable); or with a misrepresentation (i.e., that an uncertainty consisting of a knowable unknown that can be made known through known means by the time the decision must be made is true). Our concern is that such misinterpretations create unnecessary costs to academics and practitioners who are struggling to define the system they are managing. We explain this concern and its costs, detail the underlying premises, illustrate it with several examples, and then offer various specific directions to improve the theorizing over such uncertainty in entrepreneurship.

SystemsVol. 13(3)
University of Southern Maine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.