From theory to reality: The varied and often unintended consequences of card payment surcharging

This paper examines the practice of surcharging card payments, which is designed to increase transparency and reduce the cost of card acceptance for merchants. However, the theory behind surcharging does not always align with its outcomes in practice. Despite its intended benefits, such as encouraging cost-effective payment methods and reducing merchant service fees, the global implementation of surcharging has produced mixed results. While surcharging is legal in certain markets, like Australia and the USA, it often leads to overcharging by small merchants, a lack of consumer benefits, and regulatory challenges. This paper explores the current state of surcharging across key markets, identifies the main beneficiaries of the practice, and highlights the need for stronger regulation of payment acceptance costs. Ultimately, it argues that surcharging has failed to meet its goals and that a more competitive and regulated payment ecosystem is necessary to achieve genuine transparency and cost reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of payments strategy & systems
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/vhqx3574
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From theory to reality: The varied and often unintended consequences of card payment surcharging

Maja Milosavljević
Journal of payments strategy & systems
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

From theory to reality: The varied and often unintended consequences of card payment surcharging

Maja Milosavljević
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the practice of surcharging card payments, which is designed to increase transparency and reduce the cost of card acceptance for merchants. However, the theory behind surcharging does not always align with its outcomes in practice. Despite its intended benefits, such as encouraging cost-effective payment methods and reducing merchant service fees, the global implementation of surcharging has produced mixed results. While surcharging is legal in certain markets, like Australia and the USA, it often leads to overcharging by small merchants, a lack of consumer benefits, and regulatory challenges. This paper explores the current state of surcharging across key markets, identifies the main beneficiaries of the practice, and highlights the need for stronger regulation of payment acceptance costs. Ultimately, it argues that surcharging has failed to meet its goals and that a more competitive and regulated payment ecosystem is necessary to achieve genuine transparency and cost reductions.

Journal of payments strategy & systemsVol. 19(1)
Kootenay Association for Science & Technology (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.