Body typology according to the Heath-Carter somatotype vs. the Conrad system in top-level female athletes

Introduction and objectives: The physical characteristics of the athlete are related to sporting performance and can differ significantly depending on the modality practiced. The aim of the study was to apply two systems to quantify body constitution in high-level competitive women. Material and method: The sample consisted of 545 women from 35 different sports, age 23.6 ± 4.9 years, assessed during the years 2010 to 2023. From the anthropometric protocol, 15 variables were selected to calculate the endomorphic, mesomorphic and ectomorphic components of the Heath-Carter somatotype, and the metric and plastic indices of the Conrad system. Descriptive (percentiles) and comparative statistical treatment was carried out by selecting a subsample (n = 105) of seven representative modalities. Results: The mean somatotype was 3.5 - 4.1 - 2.7; mesomorphic dominant, falling into the endo-mesomorphic category. The mean metric index (-0.73 ± 0.41) was classified as metromorphic with a tendency to leptomorphic and the plasmatic index (81.5 ± 4.06) as metroplastic, with a tendency to hyperplastic. The mesomorphic and ectomorphic components had a high correlation with the metric index (rho = 0.72 and - 0.75) and with the plastic index in relation to height (rho = 0.83 and - 0.81); although they cannot be considered equivalent. The single parameter that most discriminated between the selected modalities was the metric index, which includes height and thorax diameters, with values from lowest to highest: rhythmic gymnastics, volleyball, long-distance athletics, hockey, heavy rowing, swimming, and weightlifting. Conclusion: Body physique classification is necessary to check early on the greater or lesser suitability for a sporting modality. Different parameters can be used, with the metric index standing out for its discriminative value and for being less influenced by factors such as nutritional status.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00184
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body typology according to the Heath-Carter somatotype vs. the Conrad system in top-level female athletes

Alicia Canda
1 citations
Archivos de Medicina del Deporte
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
article

Body typology according to the Heath-Carter somatotype vs. the Conrad system in top-level female athletes

Alicia Canda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: The physical characteristics of the athlete are related to sporting performance and can differ significantly depending on the modality practiced. The aim of the study was to apply two systems to quantify body constitution in high-level competitive women. Material and method: The sample consisted of 545 women from 35 different sports, age 23.6 ± 4.9 years, assessed during the years 2010 to 2023. From the anthropometric protocol, 15 variables were selected to calculate the endomorphic, mesomorphic and ectomorphic components of the Heath-Carter somatotype, and the metric and plastic indices of the Conrad system. Descriptive (percentiles) and comparative statistical treatment was carried out by selecting a subsample (n = 105) of seven representative modalities. Results: The mean somatotype was 3.5 - 4.1 - 2.7; mesomorphic dominant, falling into the endo-mesomorphic category. The mean metric index (-0.73 ± 0.41) was classified as metromorphic with a tendency to leptomorphic and the plasmatic index (81.5 ± 4.06) as metroplastic, with a tendency to hyperplastic. The mesomorphic and ectomorphic components had a high correlation with the metric index (rho = 0.72 and - 0.75) and with the plastic index in relation to height (rho = 0.83 and - 0.81); although they cannot be considered equivalent. The single parameter that most discriminated between the selected modalities was the metric index, which includes height and thorax diameters, with values from lowest to highest: rhythmic gymnastics, volleyball, long-distance athletics, hockey, heavy rowing, swimming, and weightlifting. Conclusion: Body physique classification is necessary to check early on the greater or lesser suitability for a sporting modality. Different parameters can be used, with the metric index standing out for its discriminative value and for being less influenced by factors such as nutritional status.

Archivos de Medicina del DeporteVol. 41(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.