Evaluating the robustness of deep learning models trained to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using a retrospective study

Preliminary findings demonstrated the lack of robustness of IPF diagnosis model when the DL-based model is applied to CT series collected under different imaging protocols, which indicated that care should be taken as to the acquisition and reconstruction conditions used when developing and deploying DL models into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Physics
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17752
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the robustness of deep learning models trained to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using a retrospective study

Jonathan Goldin, Jin Woo Song, Grace Hyun J. Kim, Michael F. McNitt‐Gray et al.
1 citations
Medical Physics
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.52
article

Evaluating the robustness of deep learning models trained to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using a retrospective study

Jonathan Goldin, Jin Woo Song, Grace Hyun J. Kim, Michael F. McNitt‐Gray, Wenxi Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Preliminary findings demonstrated the lack of robustness of IPF diagnosis model when the DL-based model is applied to CT series collected under different imaging protocols, which indicated that care should be taken as to the acquisition and reconstruction conditions used when developing and deploying DL models into clinical practice.

Medical PhysicsVol. 52(6)
Ulsan College (KR), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.