Relationship Between Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness Test and Concrete Strength Tests for Limestone Aggregate Concrete Based on Experimental and Statistical Study

This study investigated the mechanical properties of concrete specimens produced with a limestone aggregate through laboratory testing. Destructive tests, specifically concrete compressive strength and splitting tensile strength tests, were conducted. Additionally, the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness test, a non-destructive method, was performed on the same specimens. The experimental results, obtained from varying water-to-cement and limestone aggregate-to-cement ratios, yielded the following ranges: compressive strength from 23.6 to 42.6 MPa, splitting tensile strength from 3.2 to 5.1 MPa, and Schmidt hammer rebound values from 18 to 43 N. The correlation between the non-destructive and destructive test results was analyzed experimentally and statistically. Utilizing the experimental data, statistical models were developed, resulting in equations with a high determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.95) for accurately predicting concrete compressive and splitting tensile strengths. This approach offers the potential for significant labor and time savings in the production of sustainable conventional concrete that meets relevant standards. Furthermore, it aims to facilitate the estimation of concrete strength in existing structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061388
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship Between Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness Test and Concrete Strength Tests for Limestone Aggregate Concrete Based on Experimental and Statistical Study

Esra TUĞRUL TUNÇ
3 citations
Materials
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
2.86
article

Relationship Between Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness Test and Concrete Strength Tests for Limestone Aggregate Concrete Based on Experimental and Statistical Study

Esra TUĞRUL TUNÇ
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the mechanical properties of concrete specimens produced with a limestone aggregate through laboratory testing. Destructive tests, specifically concrete compressive strength and splitting tensile strength tests, were conducted. Additionally, the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness test, a non-destructive method, was performed on the same specimens. The experimental results, obtained from varying water-to-cement and limestone aggregate-to-cement ratios, yielded the following ranges: compressive strength from 23.6 to 42.6 MPa, splitting tensile strength from 3.2 to 5.1 MPa, and Schmidt hammer rebound values from 18 to 43 N. The correlation between the non-destructive and destructive test results was analyzed experimentally and statistically. Utilizing the experimental data, statistical models were developed, resulting in equations with a high determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.95) for accurately predicting concrete compressive and splitting tensile strengths. This approach offers the potential for significant labor and time savings in the production of sustainable conventional concrete that meets relevant standards. Furthermore, it aims to facilitate the estimation of concrete strength in existing structures.

MaterialsVol. 18(6)
Fırat University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.