Die expliziten Theodor von Mopsuestia-Referenzen in der ostsyrischen Literatur zur Genesis. Präliminarien zu einer Sammlung der Fragmente und Zeugnisse zu Theodors Genesiskommentar

Abstract: Theodore of Mopsuestia’s commentaries are widely used in later Eastern Syrian literature, yet very rarely quoted, and if so, they are often referenced in a questionable or ambiguous manner. The present contribution thus undertakes a comprehensive comparison of all the explicit Theodore-references in the relevant texts on Genesis (Anonymus Diyarbakir, Theodore bar Koni, Isho‘ bar Nun, Isho‘dad of Merv) in order to assess their reliability as possible witnesses for his Genesis-commentary. Although this reliability can in general be taken for granted, it is also called into question by two problematic tendencies: First, they tend to ascribe complex theories to “Theodore and others” only a nucleus of which actually goes back to the interpreter. Second, they seek the latter’s authority in the context of discussions his commentary did not directly take part in and thus recontextualize his exegetical decisions (or possible consequences thereof) in a way which has very little to do with original wording or intention of his text.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of early Christian studies
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2025.a954625
Primary Topic
Ancient Near East History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Die expliziten Theodor von Mopsuestia-Referenzen in der ostsyrischen Literatur zur Genesis. Präliminarien zu einer Sammlung der Fragmente und Zeugnisse zu Theodors Genesiskommentar

Benjamin Gleede
Journal of early Christian studies
Ancient Near East History
article

Die expliziten Theodor von Mopsuestia-Referenzen in der ostsyrischen Literatur zur Genesis. Präliminarien zu einer Sammlung der Fragmente und Zeugnisse zu Theodors Genesiskommentar

Benjamin Gleede
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Theodore of Mopsuestia’s commentaries are widely used in later Eastern Syrian literature, yet very rarely quoted, and if so, they are often referenced in a questionable or ambiguous manner. The present contribution thus undertakes a comprehensive comparison of all the explicit Theodore-references in the relevant texts on Genesis (Anonymus Diyarbakir, Theodore bar Koni, Isho‘ bar Nun, Isho‘dad of Merv) in order to assess their reliability as possible witnesses for his Genesis-commentary. Although this reliability can in general be taken for granted, it is also called into question by two problematic tendencies: First, they tend to ascribe complex theories to “Theodore and others” only a nucleus of which actually goes back to the interpreter. Second, they seek the latter’s authority in the context of discussions his commentary did not directly take part in and thus recontextualize his exegetical decisions (or possible consequences thereof) in a way which has very little to do with original wording or intention of his text.

Journal of early Christian studiesVol. 33(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ancient Near East History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.