Comparison of TruFirm Turf Firmness Meter and Clegg impact soil tester measurements on athletic fields

Abstract The Clegg impact soil tester (CIST) and TruFirm Turf Firmness Meter (TruFirm) are devices that measure turf surface hardness. Correlations between the devices have been limited to putting greens with little attention paid to higher mowed athletic fields. The objectives of this study were to determine the ability to predict CIST values from TruFirm measurements, with and without considering soil volumetric water content (VWC), and to evaluate how traffic influences the predictive relationship between the devices. TruFirm, CIST, VWC, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measurements were obtained from bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers × Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt Davy] research plots with and without the use of a Baldtree traffic simulator to apply traffic and from bermudagrass soccer fields receiving heavy play in 2 of the 3 years the study was conducted. Cultivation practices were imposed across all sites with the turfgrass overseeded with intermediate ryegrass ( Lolium × hybridum Hausskn.) in October each year. Poor fits were obtained from trafficked research plots ( r 2 = 0.26, p < 0.0001) and athletic fields ( r 2 = 0.19, p < 0.0001) when predicting CIST from TruFirm measurements. Adding VWC as a second variable raised the coefficient of determination in trafficked research plots ( R 2 = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and athletic fields ( R 2 = 0.41, p < 0.0001), with both relationships continuing to have a high degree of uncertainty in predicting CIST. NDVI was significantly higher for the trafficked research plots than for the non‐trafficked research plots and athletic fields. On the non‐trafficked research plots, the simple linear relationship between CIST and TruFirm was not significant ( p = 0.1782), which may be due to CIST and TruFirm having differential responses to changes in turf canopy properties. This may be due to the shape and mass of the objects used to measure hardness and firmness in the two devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/its2.70020
Primary Topic
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of TruFirm Turf Firmness Meter and Clegg impact soil tester measurements on athletic fields

Joseph Roberts, Mark Carroll, Shravya Peddigari
International Turfgrass Society research journal
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
article

Comparison of TruFirm Turf Firmness Meter and Clegg impact soil tester measurements on athletic fields

Joseph Roberts, Mark Carroll, Shravya Peddigari
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Clegg impact soil tester (CIST) and TruFirm Turf Firmness Meter (TruFirm) are devices that measure turf surface hardness. Correlations between the devices have been limited to putting greens with little attention paid to higher mowed athletic fields. The objectives of this study were to determine the ability to predict CIST values from TruFirm measurements, with and without considering soil volumetric water content (VWC), and to evaluate how traffic influences the predictive relationship between the devices. TruFirm, CIST, VWC, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measurements were obtained from bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers × Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt Davy] research plots with and without the use of a Baldtree traffic simulator to apply traffic and from bermudagrass soccer fields receiving heavy play in 2 of the 3 years the study was conducted. Cultivation practices were imposed across all sites with the turfgrass overseeded with intermediate ryegrass ( Lolium × hybridum Hausskn.) in October each year. Poor fits were obtained from trafficked research plots ( r 2 = 0.26, p < 0.0001) and athletic fields ( r 2 = 0.19, p < 0.0001) when predicting CIST from TruFirm measurements. Adding VWC as a second variable raised the coefficient of determination in trafficked research plots ( R 2 = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and athletic fields ( R 2 = 0.41, p < 0.0001), with both relationships continuing to have a high degree of uncertainty in predicting CIST. NDVI was significantly higher for the trafficked research plots than for the non‐trafficked research plots and athletic fields. On the non‐trafficked research plots, the simple linear relationship between CIST and TruFirm was not significant ( p = 0.1782), which may be due to CIST and TruFirm having differential responses to changes in turf canopy properties. This may be due to the shape and mass of the objects used to measure hardness and firmness in the two devices.

International Turfgrass Society research journalVol. 15(1)
University of Maryland, College Park (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.