Sinews of empire? The Crown Agents for the Colonies and African government debt under colonial rule

In 1924, John Maynard Keynes complained about the fact that Southern Rhodesia, which he described as “a place somewhere in the middle of Africa”, was able to raise loans on the London market on the same terms as a large English borough. Existing literature on the “empire effect” has contended that investors did not discriminate between the bond issues of different colonies, either because they adopted similar economic and financial policies or because they were considered to be subsidiary governments to metropolitan states. However, archival records suggest that this was not the case and that African bonds were particularly unpopular. Contemporaries stressed that maintaining low borrowing costs for African colonies required considerable behind the scenes interventions by the Crown Agents using reserve funds they held on behalf of other colonies. This paper presents preliminary data on the financial connections between colonies created by this practice, which it calls the “sinews” of empire, and examines the implications for debates about imperialism and financial globalisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Government and Economics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2025.100138
Citations
1
Primary Topic
African history and culture studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sinews of empire? The Crown Agents for the Colonies and African government debt under colonial rule

Leigh Gardner, Tehreem Husain
1 citations
Journal of Government and Economics
African history and culture studies
11.35
article

Sinews of empire? The Crown Agents for the Colonies and African government debt under colonial rule

Leigh Gardner, Tehreem Husain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 1924, John Maynard Keynes complained about the fact that Southern Rhodesia, which he described as “a place somewhere in the middle of Africa”, was able to raise loans on the London market on the same terms as a large English borough. Existing literature on the “empire effect” has contended that investors did not discriminate between the bond issues of different colonies, either because they adopted similar economic and financial policies or because they were considered to be subsidiary governments to metropolitan states. However, archival records suggest that this was not the case and that African bonds were particularly unpopular. Contemporaries stressed that maintaining low borrowing costs for African colonies required considerable behind the scenes interventions by the Crown Agents using reserve funds they held on behalf of other colonies. This paper presents preliminary data on the financial connections between colonies created by this practice, which it calls the “sinews” of empire, and examines the implications for debates about imperialism and financial globalisation.

Journal of Government and EconomicsVol. 17
Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
African history and culture studies
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.