The Intersection of Race, Data, and Learning: Applying QuantCrit to Mathematics Education Research

Mathematics education research has long relied on traditional quantitative methodologies that often obscure systemic inequities. This editorial advocates for the integration of Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit) to critically examine the racialized dimensions of mathematical learning, assessment, and policy. QuantCrit challenges the assumed neutrality of data interrogates deficit-based narratives and calls for the use of quantitative methods that advance social justice. By applying QuantCrit, researchers can uncover how structural barriers shape student outcomes and reframe assessment practices to better support historically marginalized learners. This editorial highlights key tenets of QuantCrit, explores its implications for mathematics education, and provides actionable strategies for scholars and educators to incorporate this framework into research and practice. A shift toward justice-oriented quantitative methodologies is necessary to ensure mathematics education fosters equity and inclusion. This work urges researchers and policymakers to engage with QuantCrit as a transformative tool for reimagining mathematics education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v17i2a730
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intersection of Race, Data, and Learning: Applying QuantCrit to Mathematics Education Research

Jemimah L. Young, Kristian Edosomwan, Jamaal Young
1 links
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

The Intersection of Race, Data, and Learning: Applying QuantCrit to Mathematics Education Research

Jemimah L. Young, Kristian Edosomwan, Jamaal Young
article en

Abstract

Mathematics education research has long relied on traditional quantitative methodologies that often obscure systemic inequities. This editorial advocates for the integration of Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit) to critically examine the racialized dimensions of mathematical learning, assessment, and policy. QuantCrit challenges the assumed neutrality of data interrogates deficit-based narratives and calls for the use of quantitative methods that advance social justice. By applying QuantCrit, researchers can uncover how structural barriers shape student outcomes and reframe assessment practices to better support historically marginalized learners. This editorial highlights key tenets of QuantCrit, explores its implications for mathematics education, and provides actionable strategies for scholars and educators to incorporate this framework into research and practice. A shift toward justice-oriented quantitative methodologies is necessary to ensure mathematics education fosters equity and inclusion. This work urges researchers and policymakers to engage with QuantCrit as a transformative tool for reimagining mathematics education.

Journal of Urban Mathematics EducationVol. 17(2)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.