Analysing diagnostic practices and referral pathways for glaucoma in Australian primary eye care
Most optometrists have access to advanced diagnostic tools, know how to appropriately diagnose and manage glaucoma and have similar inter-observer variability when assessing fundus photographs to that of glaucoma sub-specialists, but few feel confident in independently diagnosing and managing glaucoma.
Authors
- Christian Davey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-9769)
- Jiahao Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9979-5805)
- Algis J. Vingrys (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-4604)
- Randall S. Stafford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-1271)
- Catherine Jan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-8208)
- Jennifer C. Fan Gaskin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-9700)
- Xianwen Shang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-9349)
- Peter van Wijngaarden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8831-7836)
- Mingguang He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6664-3442)
- George Y. X. Kong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-3046)
- Jacqueline Henwood
Institutions
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Hong Kong Eye Hospital (CN)
- Vision Australia (AU)
- Australian College of Optometry (AU)
- Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Published
- 2025-03-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13491
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.41