What aspects of staff, prisoner and systemic attributes have been found to reduce or increase the likelihood of sexual boundary violations in prisons?

Purpose Sexual boundary violations (SBV) can have significant implications in any environment, including that of a prison setting. Conducting research on a sensitive topic in prison services can be difficult to achieve, however, understanding why SBV occur can support the development of proactive policies and effective management strategies. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this rapid evidence assessment was to collate information relating to why SBV occur through a structured review. Findings A total of 12 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Narrative synthesis was used to review the data and identify common factors. Two overarching themes emerged from the data, which included factors that increase the likelihood of SBV to occur in prisons and personal motivators. Most studies included in the review were qualitative and all were based in the USA, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to other countries. Research limitations/implications Most of the studies included in the review were qualitative, and all were based in the USA, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to other countries. Practical implications Recommendations for practice are provided in terms of how SBV can be reduced and how people can be best supported. Originality/value This review helps build on the current understanding of SBV, which poses a risk to the safety and well-being of both staff and prisoners. Recommendations for practice are provided in terms of how SBV can be reduced and how people can be best supported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Practice
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-04-2024-0011
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What aspects of staff, prisoner and systemic attributes have been found to reduce or increase the likelihood of sexual boundary violations in prisons?

Madeline Smyth, Siân Evans, Rachel Worthington
Journal of Forensic Practice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

What aspects of staff, prisoner and systemic attributes have been found to reduce or increase the likelihood of sexual boundary violations in prisons?

Madeline Smyth, Siân Evans, Rachel Worthington
article en

Abstract

Purpose Sexual boundary violations (SBV) can have significant implications in any environment, including that of a prison setting. Conducting research on a sensitive topic in prison services can be difficult to achieve, however, understanding why SBV occur can support the development of proactive policies and effective management strategies. Design/methodology/approach The aim of this rapid evidence assessment was to collate information relating to why SBV occur through a structured review. Findings A total of 12 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Narrative synthesis was used to review the data and identify common factors. Two overarching themes emerged from the data, which included factors that increase the likelihood of SBV to occur in prisons and personal motivators. Most studies included in the review were qualitative and all were based in the USA, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to other countries. Research limitations/implications Most of the studies included in the review were qualitative, and all were based in the USA, which may limit the generalisability of the findings to other countries. Practical implications Recommendations for practice are provided in terms of how SBV can be reduced and how people can be best supported. Originality/value This review helps build on the current understanding of SBV, which poses a risk to the safety and well-being of both staff and prisoners. Recommendations for practice are provided in terms of how SBV can be reduced and how people can be best supported.

Journal of Forensic PracticeVol. 27(4)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB), Hologic (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What aspects of staff, prisoner and systemic attributes have been found to reduce or increase the likelihood of sexual boundary violations in prisons? — Madeline Smyth, Siân Evans, et al. · Journal of Forensic Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS