Mid-level qualifications in the divided tertiary education systems in Australia and England

The Universities Accord 2024 in Australia and the Augar Review 2019 in England both argue for a more cohesive tertiary education system and consider promoting mid-level qualifications.This paper compares the roles of mid-level qualifications in the two countries' current systems.We review government reports and analyse national statistics, and find that despite England's population being three times larger, Australia's mid-level qualification enrolments were three times higher, mainly driven by Diplomas and Advanced Diplomas.Both countries have intricate networks of midlevel qualification providers and funding systems that prioritise Bachelor's Degrees over mid-level qualifications.However, England has recently announced a new funding policy, the lifelong learning entitlement, which was motivated partly to promote participation in mid-level qualifications.In contrast, a significant barrier for Australia is its complex funding system involving both state and federal governments.These findings suggest a need to consider reforms to possibly expand the role of mid-level qualifications.