Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages, Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Sugar Forms With Long‐Term Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Large‐Scale Prospective Cohort Study

We aimed to examine the prospective association of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB), natural juice, and sugar forms with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Participants free of IBS, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and any cancer at recruitment were included (<i>N</i> = 178,711, 53.1% female). SSB, ASB, natural juice, and different sugar forms' consumption were measured via a 24-h dietary recall questionnaire. The primary outcome was incident IBS. A Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for age, sex, BMI, Townsend deprivation index, education, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, total energy intake, type 2 diabetes, depression, and anxiety was conducted to assess the relationship. Mean consumption of SSB, ASB, and natural juice was 90.0, 72.4, and 105.7 g/day, respectively. During a median of 11.3-year follow-up, 2690 participants developed IBS. Every 100 g/day SSB increment was associated with a 3% higher IBS risk (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). Compared with no SSB intake, the highest quartile was associated with an increased risk of IBS (HR = 1.19, 1.03-1.37; <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.017). Regarding ASB and natural juice, no significant association was detected in those who consumed the highest quartile versus no intake (ASB: HR<sub>Q4 VS no intake</sub> = 1.12, 0.95-1.31, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.062; Natural juice: HR<sub>Q4 VS no intake</sub> = 1.01, 0.87-1.18, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.363). Considering different sugar forms, increased IBS risk was detected in added sugar (HR<sub>Q4 VS Q1</sub> = 1.20, 1.05-1.36, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.001), instead of naturally occurring sugar (HR<sub>Q4 VS Q1</sub> = 0.99, 0.88-1.11, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.869). Higher intake of SSB, rather than ASB and natural juice, is associated with increased IBS risk. Higher consumption of added sugar, instead of naturally occurring sugar, is associated with higher IBS risk. These findings highlight the importance of limiting SSB consumption in diets to reduce the modifiable burden of IBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science & Nutrition
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.70094
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages, Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Sugar Forms With Long‐Term Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Large‐Scale Prospective Cohort Study

Zhirong Yang, Shengtao Zhu, Shutian Zhang, Si Liu et al.
Food Science & Nutrition
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Sugar‐Sweetened Beverages, Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Sugar Forms With Long‐Term Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Large‐Scale Prospective Cohort Study

Zhirong Yang, Shengtao Zhu, Shutian Zhang, Si Liu, Qian Zhang, Shanshan Wu
article en

Abstract

We aimed to examine the prospective association of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), artificially sweetened beverages (ASB), natural juice, and sugar forms with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Participants free of IBS, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and any cancer at recruitment were included (<i>N</i> = 178,711, 53.1% female). SSB, ASB, natural juice, and different sugar forms' consumption were measured via a 24-h dietary recall questionnaire. The primary outcome was incident IBS. A Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for age, sex, BMI, Townsend deprivation index, education, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, total energy intake, type 2 diabetes, depression, and anxiety was conducted to assess the relationship. Mean consumption of SSB, ASB, and natural juice was 90.0, 72.4, and 105.7 g/day, respectively. During a median of 11.3-year follow-up, 2690 participants developed IBS. Every 100 g/day SSB increment was associated with a 3% higher IBS risk (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). Compared with no SSB intake, the highest quartile was associated with an increased risk of IBS (HR = 1.19, 1.03-1.37; <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.017). Regarding ASB and natural juice, no significant association was detected in those who consumed the highest quartile versus no intake (ASB: HR<sub>Q4 VS no intake</sub> = 1.12, 0.95-1.31, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.062; Natural juice: HR<sub>Q4 VS no intake</sub> = 1.01, 0.87-1.18, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.363). Considering different sugar forms, increased IBS risk was detected in added sugar (HR<sub>Q4 VS Q1</sub> = 1.20, 1.05-1.36, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.001), instead of naturally occurring sugar (HR<sub>Q4 VS Q1</sub> = 0.99, 0.88-1.11, <i>p</i> <sub>trend</sub> = 0.869). Higher intake of SSB, rather than ASB and natural juice, is associated with increased IBS risk. Higher consumption of added sugar, instead of naturally occurring sugar, is associated with higher IBS risk. These findings highlight the importance of limiting SSB consumption in diets to reduce the modifiable burden of IBS.

Food Science & NutritionVol. 13(3)
Capital Medical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Cambridge (GB), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN)
Beijing Nova Program, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.