Navigating the Paradox of Originality and Usefulness: The Roles of Distinct Error Climates in Fostering Team Radical Creativity

ABSTRACT Team radical creativity inherently involves a paradox between high originality and usefulness. Yet, few studies shed light on an effective strategy for navigating the originality‐usefulness paradox of team radical creativity. Drawing on the Motivated Information Processing in Groups Model, this study investigates how and when distinct error climates work together to reconcile this paradox and stimulate team radical creativity. We conducted a field study in high‐technology companies, including electronic communications, bio‐pharmaceutical technology, advanced manufacturing and automation, and aerospace technology industries. We collected data from 125 research and development (R&D) teams involving 686 employees. Our results show that (1) error management climate exerts a positive influence while error aversion climate exerts an inverted U‐shaped influence on team radical creativity through motivating or demotivating team information exchange and (2) task reflexivity moderates the indirect positive influences of error management climate and low to moderate levels of error aversion climate on team radical creativity through team information exchange. We conclude that the combination of a high level of error management climate and a moderate level of error aversion climate is conducive to reconciling the paradox of originality and usefulness and fostering team radical creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Creativity and Innovation Management
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12661
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Paradox of Originality and Usefulness: The Roles of Distinct Error Climates in Fostering Team Radical Creativity

Jinjie Xue, Mengmeng Xiao, Haizhen Wang, Zizhen Geng et al.
6 citations
Creativity and Innovation Management
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
12.71
article

Navigating the Paradox of Originality and Usefulness: The Roles of Distinct Error Climates in Fostering Team Radical Creativity

Jinjie Xue, Mengmeng Xiao, Haizhen Wang, Zizhen Geng, Yanfen Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Team radical creativity inherently involves a paradox between high originality and usefulness. Yet, few studies shed light on an effective strategy for navigating the originality‐usefulness paradox of team radical creativity. Drawing on the Motivated Information Processing in Groups Model, this study investigates how and when distinct error climates work together to reconcile this paradox and stimulate team radical creativity. We conducted a field study in high‐technology companies, including electronic communications, bio‐pharmaceutical technology, advanced manufacturing and automation, and aerospace technology industries. We collected data from 125 research and development (R&D) teams involving 686 employees. Our results show that (1) error management climate exerts a positive influence while error aversion climate exerts an inverted U‐shaped influence on team radical creativity through motivating or demotivating team information exchange and (2) task reflexivity moderates the indirect positive influences of error management climate and low to moderate levels of error aversion climate on team radical creativity through team information exchange. We conclude that the combination of a high level of error management climate and a moderate level of error aversion climate is conducive to reconciling the paradox of originality and usefulness and fostering team radical creativity.

Creativity and Innovation ManagementVol. 34(3)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Xi'an International Studies University (CN), Wuhan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
12.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.