Does ESG information draw more visual attention than financial information?

Recent disclosure mandates focus on reporting information about nonfinancial dimensions of performance regarding corporate environmental social and governance (ESG) activities and impacts. Unlike financial information, few programs teach students how to read and interpret ESG disclosures. Further, ESG information tends to be nonfinancial, non-standardized, and lacks a consistent measurement basis (e.g. tons of emissions or kilowatt hours of energy). This makes it difficult for decision-makers to aggregate and process ESG information. In a laboratory experiment employing eye-tracking technology, we find that participants expend more effort processing ESG information. The additional processing is focused on understanding which metrics are disclosed. Further analysis indicates that familiarity with evaluating ESG performance is associated with how decision-makers include ESG information in overall performance evaluations. Our results have implications for both standard setting and future accounting curricula. JEL Classification: M41

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251319724
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does ESG information draw more visual attention than financial information?

Naomi S. Soderstrom, Dennis D. Fehrenbacher
1 citations
Australian Journal of Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

Does ESG information draw more visual attention than financial information?

Naomi S. Soderstrom, Dennis D. Fehrenbacher
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent disclosure mandates focus on reporting information about nonfinancial dimensions of performance regarding corporate environmental social and governance (ESG) activities and impacts. Unlike financial information, few programs teach students how to read and interpret ESG disclosures. Further, ESG information tends to be nonfinancial, non-standardized, and lacks a consistent measurement basis (e.g. tons of emissions or kilowatt hours of energy). This makes it difficult for decision-makers to aggregate and process ESG information. In a laboratory experiment employing eye-tracking technology, we find that participants expend more effort processing ESG information. The additional processing is focused on understanding which metrics are disclosed. Further analysis indicates that familiarity with evaluating ESG performance is associated with how decision-makers include ESG information in overall performance evaluations. Our results have implications for both standard setting and future accounting curricula. JEL Classification: M41

Australian Journal of Management
The University of Melbourne (AU), University of St.Gallen (CH), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.