The role of technology in developing resilient supply chains: a systematic literature review during the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruptions of economic sanctions

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of technology in enhancing the resilience of humanitarian and commercial supply chains during disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and economic sanctions. Design/methodology/approach A five-step review process for conducting a systematic literature review was adopted to frame future technological interests that depict the role of technology. Findings This study identified key technological inventions, such as Industry 4.0 technologies, that help supply chains recover and adapt to crises. The study findings show that while technology offers significant benefits in mitigating disruptions, a gap remains between technological advancements and practical performance, particularly in humanitarian contexts. Humanitarian supply chains require technology that provides quality information sharing and collaborative decision-making capabilities for reactive approaches. Most literature prioritises large and complex data processing and transactions, cybersecurity, hybridised systems, visibility, transparency, interconnection, responsiveness and collaborative technological features that lead to a resilient supply chain and the ability to respond to future crises. Research limitations/implications This study explores the role of technology in building resilient supply chain systems during disruptions, using a time-bound approach for efficient research and comprehensive literature analysis. Practical implications Understanding the role of technologies in logistics and supply chain activities helps evaluate and select various technologies and technological features to overcome the impact of disruptive events or shocks on supply chains. Social implications Shaping, expanding and forecasting the technological requirements for supply chain systems provides the conceptual foundation for developing resilient supply chains. Originality/value The new insights from this study demonstrate how the technology was used across industry sectors to overcome the pandemic’s and Russian economic sanctions’ impact on supply chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhlscm-03-2024-0036
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of technology in developing resilient supply chains: a systematic literature review during the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruptions of economic sanctions

Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, Daniel Henao Zapata, Abebe Ejigu Alemu, Andre Kreie et al.
4 citations
Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
article

The role of technology in developing resilient supply chains: a systematic literature review during the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruptions of economic sanctions

Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, Daniel Henao Zapata, Abebe Ejigu Alemu, Andre Kreie, Simon Peter Nadeem, Bahman Rostami-Tabar, Birhanu Shanko Dura
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of technology in enhancing the resilience of humanitarian and commercial supply chains during disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and economic sanctions. Design/methodology/approach A five-step review process for conducting a systematic literature review was adopted to frame future technological interests that depict the role of technology. Findings This study identified key technological inventions, such as Industry 4.0 technologies, that help supply chains recover and adapt to crises. The study findings show that while technology offers significant benefits in mitigating disruptions, a gap remains between technological advancements and practical performance, particularly in humanitarian contexts. Humanitarian supply chains require technology that provides quality information sharing and collaborative decision-making capabilities for reactive approaches. Most literature prioritises large and complex data processing and transactions, cybersecurity, hybridised systems, visibility, transparency, interconnection, responsiveness and collaborative technological features that lead to a resilient supply chain and the ability to respond to future crises. Research limitations/implications This study explores the role of technology in building resilient supply chain systems during disruptions, using a time-bound approach for efficient research and comprehensive literature analysis. Practical implications Understanding the role of technologies in logistics and supply chain activities helps evaluate and select various technologies and technological features to overcome the impact of disruptive events or shocks on supply chains. Social implications Shaping, expanding and forecasting the technological requirements for supply chain systems provides the conceptual foundation for developing resilient supply chains. Originality/value The new insights from this study demonstrate how the technology was used across industry sectors to overcome the pandemic’s and Russian economic sanctions’ impact on supply chains.

Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementVol. 16(1)
Kühne Logistics University (DE), University of Derby (GB), National Transport University (UA), Bahir Dar University (ET), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.