Impact of Single-Unit Transfusion on Patients Receiving Treatment for Acute Leukemia and Other Hematological Diseases

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are a critical component of managing anemia in patients with acute leukemia and other hematological diseases. However, concerns regarding transfusion-related complications, resource utilization, and blood shortages have led to increased interest in restrictive transfusion strategies. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single-unit RBC transfusion strategy compared to the conventional double-unit approach in hematological patients.This study including 200 patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia or other hematological disorders. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-unit RBC transfusion (n = 100) or double-unit RBC transfusion (n = 100). The primary outcome was the composite incidence of severe complications, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-transfusion hemoglobin levels, transfusion-related adverse events, total RBC usage, hospital stay duration, and quality of life improvements. There were no significant differences between the single-unit and double-unit groups in ICU admission rates (12.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.72) or 30-day mortality (7.9% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.64). However, the single-unit group required significantly fewer transfusions (mean: 3.2 vs. 5.6 RBC units per patient, p < 0.001) and had longer transfusion intervals (10.3 vs. 8.1 days, p < 0.001). The hospital stay was shorter in the single-unit group (12.5 vs. 14.0 days, p = 0.03). While post-transfusion hemoglobin levels were higher in the double-unit group (9.3 vs. 8.5 g/dL, p < 0.001), this did not translate into improved clinical outcomes. Transfusion-related complications, particularly TACO, were more frequent in the double-unit group (4.0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.05). The results demonstrate that a single-unit RBC transfusion strategy is non-inferior to the standard double-unit approach in terms of severe complications. Additionally, single-unit transfusion reduced overall RBC utilization, decreased transfusion-related complications, and shortened hospital stays. These findings support the adoption of restrictive transfusion protocols in hematological patients, especially in the context of blood shortages and resource optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.6645
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Single-Unit Transfusion on Patients Receiving Treatment for Acute Leukemia and Other Hematological Diseases

Rawan A. Alzahrani, Nawaf Fayez Alshehri, Mohammed Alfaifi, Turki Alshareef et al.
Journal of Ecohumanism
Blood transfusion and management
article

Impact of Single-Unit Transfusion on Patients Receiving Treatment for Acute Leukemia and Other Hematological Diseases

Rawan A. Alzahrani, Nawaf Fayez Alshehri, Mohammed Alfaifi, Turki Alshareef, A.O.M. Alzahrani, Mervat Ali Mostafa Gaber, Reham Alshenqiti, Amany M Elfeky, Aida Salah Aldawai, Wedad awadh Alenazi- Name, Hassan Ali Tohary, Aidah Awadh Almenhali
article en

Abstract

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are a critical component of managing anemia in patients with acute leukemia and other hematological diseases. However, concerns regarding transfusion-related complications, resource utilization, and blood shortages have led to increased interest in restrictive transfusion strategies. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single-unit RBC transfusion strategy compared to the conventional double-unit approach in hematological patients.This study including 200 patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia or other hematological disorders. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-unit RBC transfusion (n = 100) or double-unit RBC transfusion (n = 100). The primary outcome was the composite incidence of severe complications, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-transfusion hemoglobin levels, transfusion-related adverse events, total RBC usage, hospital stay duration, and quality of life improvements. There were no significant differences between the single-unit and double-unit groups in ICU admission rates (12.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.72) or 30-day mortality (7.9% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.64). However, the single-unit group required significantly fewer transfusions (mean: 3.2 vs. 5.6 RBC units per patient, p < 0.001) and had longer transfusion intervals (10.3 vs. 8.1 days, p < 0.001). The hospital stay was shorter in the single-unit group (12.5 vs. 14.0 days, p = 0.03). While post-transfusion hemoglobin levels were higher in the double-unit group (9.3 vs. 8.5 g/dL, p < 0.001), this did not translate into improved clinical outcomes. Transfusion-related complications, particularly TACO, were more frequent in the double-unit group (4.0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.05). The results demonstrate that a single-unit RBC transfusion strategy is non-inferior to the standard double-unit approach in terms of severe complications. Additionally, single-unit transfusion reduced overall RBC utilization, decreased transfusion-related complications, and shortened hospital stays. These findings support the adoption of restrictive transfusion protocols in hematological patients, especially in the context of blood shortages and resource optimization.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 3(8)
Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Saad Specialist Hospital (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), Specialty Materials (United States) (US), King Fahd Military Medical Complex (SA), Hainan General Hospital (CN), Oncology Specialists (US), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.