Microscopically-assisted Uninstrumented Surgical Tumor Decompression as an alternative to open surgery for symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression
Our findings indicate that the MUST-D technique provides surgical advantages compared to standard open surgery for MESCC, with significant improvement in perioperative outcomes. Although both groups had similar 1-year mortality, the MUST-D cohort demonstrated shorter time to RTx, faster postoperative ambulation, improved 30-day ambulatory function, similar index level revision rates, and longer time to death compared to open procedures. With no inferior outcome recorded in our study, the MUST-D technique is observed as an improvement over standard approach. Thus, we propose the MUST-D technique as an alternative treatment modality for symptomatic MESCC decompression. Larger randomized prospective studies with robust clinical correlation are warranted to confirm these findings.
Authors
- Arthur L. Jenkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-0420)
- Camryn Harvie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-464X)
- John C. O’Donnell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-3783)
- Shriya Suresh
- Alexander J. Schüpper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-8138)
- Richard J. Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0675-727X)
Institutions
- NeuroSpine Institute (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Spine Surgery
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-135
- Primary Topic
- Management of metastatic bone disease
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00