Optimal Dose of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion in Obese Patients: A Double‐Blind Randomized Trial

<b>Background:</b> Magnesium sulfate reduces opioid use and its associated side effects. However, no consensus exists on whether the optimal dosing should be based on actual body weight or adjusted ideal body weight. The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative analgesia after magnesium sulfate infusion, using doses calculated based on actual body weight versus adjusted ideal body weight. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included 75 participants who underwent target-controlled intravenous general anesthesia. The participants were divided into three groups: a control group (CG), a group receiving magnesium sulfate calculated by actual body weight (AWG), and a group receiving magnesium sulfate calculated based on the adjusted ideal body weight (IWG). <b>Results:</b> The AWG had significantly lower pain scores than the CG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and IWG (<i>p</i>=0.017). Opioid use was similar between the AWG and IWG, but significantly higher in the CG (AWG = IWG, <i>p</i>=0.08; CG > AWG, <i>p</i> < 0.001; CG = IWG, <i>p</i> 0.03). The increase in magnesium concentration did not reach clinically relevant levels. Neuromuscular blockade latency decreased in the groups receiving magnesium sulfate (<i>p</i> < 0.001 in both comparisons) compared to the CG. <b>Conclusion:</b> Calculating the dose of magnesium sulfate based on actual body weight enhances postoperative analgesia. The increase in magnesium concentration was not clinically significant and did not interfere with the action of cisatracurium in the groups receiving magnesium sulfate. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645719.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/8854830
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Dose of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion in Obese Patients: A Double‐Blind Randomized Trial

Joaquim Edson Vieira, Ferreira Soares, Gina Matias, Sebastião E. Silva Filho et al.
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Optimal Dose of Magnesium Sulfate Infusion in Obese Patients: A Double‐Blind Randomized Trial

Joaquim Edson Vieira, Ferreira Soares, Gina Matias, Sebastião E. Silva Filho, Carla Letícia Bandeira, Flavio Angelis, Sandro Dainez, Gonzalez M A M C
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Magnesium sulfate reduces opioid use and its associated side effects. However, no consensus exists on whether the optimal dosing should be based on actual body weight or adjusted ideal body weight. The primary objective of this study was to compare postoperative analgesia after magnesium sulfate infusion, using doses calculated based on actual body weight versus adjusted ideal body weight. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial included 75 participants who underwent target-controlled intravenous general anesthesia. The participants were divided into three groups: a control group (CG), a group receiving magnesium sulfate calculated by actual body weight (AWG), and a group receiving magnesium sulfate calculated based on the adjusted ideal body weight (IWG). <b>Results:</b> The AWG had significantly lower pain scores than the CG (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and IWG (<i>p</i>=0.017). Opioid use was similar between the AWG and IWG, but significantly higher in the CG (AWG = IWG, <i>p</i>=0.08; CG > AWG, <i>p</i> < 0.001; CG = IWG, <i>p</i> 0.03). The increase in magnesium concentration did not reach clinically relevant levels. Neuromuscular blockade latency decreased in the groups receiving magnesium sulfate (<i>p</i> < 0.001 in both comparisons) compared to the CG. <b>Conclusion:</b> Calculating the dose of magnesium sulfate based on actual body weight enhances postoperative analgesia. The increase in magnesium concentration was not clinically significant and did not interfere with the action of cisatracurium in the groups receiving magnesium sulfate. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645719.

Anesthesiology Research and PracticeVol. 2025(1)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR), Department of Aerospace Science and Technology (BR), Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.