Nexus between Socioeconomic Factors, Indigenous Chicken Productivity, and Community-defined Livelihood Outcomes among Rural Communities in Kericho County, Kenya

Rural poultry rearing is common worldwide, particularly in developing countries, where indigenous chicken (IC) dominates and serves as a vital asset for resource-poor households. Despite their importance, backyard chickens face productivity challenges such as inconsistent nutrition, poor health management, and fluctuating environmental conditions. While numerous studies address these technical challenges, socioeconomic contexts are often overlooked. This study investigated the nexus between socioeconomic factors, IC productivity, and community-defined livelihood outcomes among rural communities in Kericho County, Kenya. Grounded in contextualism, the study pursued three objectives: (1) examine socioeconomic determinants of IC productivity, (2) analyze the relationship between IC productivity and community-defined livelihood outcomes, using a participatory approach, and (3) explore the nexus between socioeconomic factors, IC productivity, and livelihood outcomes. A community-based participatory action research framework was employed, combining qualitative data from focus group discussions and quantitative data from a cross-sectional survey. Sample size was determined by Yamane’s formula and purposive and stratified random sampling techniques were used to select participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential methods; SPSS version 27 aided quantitative analysis. Findings indicated that IC productivity is influenced by farmers’ socioeconomic factors; access to information, knowledge-seeking behaviour, social networking, enterprise diversity, household size, flock size, and age. Productivity measures; egg production and chick survival rates, varied significantly across livelihood outcome categories based on Welch ANOVA; F (3, 38.31) = 15.68, p < .001, ƞ2 = .124 and F (3, 36.545) = 34.875, p < .001, ƞ2 = .197 respectively, but self-reported profitability did not (p > .05). Challenges revolved around economic powerlessness and weak information-seeking behaviour. The study concludes that socioeconomic attributes, including information-seeking and social networking, are integral to the productivity of Indigenous chickens and community-defined livelihood outcomes. It recommends that stakeholders and policy-makers support integrating farmer groups into broader networks to foster collaboration and improve productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.8.1.2788
Primary Topic
Livestock and Poultry Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nexus between Socioeconomic Factors, Indigenous Chicken Productivity, and Community-defined Livelihood Outcomes among Rural Communities in Kericho County, Kenya

George M. Kere, Joseph Kipkorir Cheruiyot, Michael E. Omunyin, Joash K. Kibett
East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology
Livestock and Poultry Management
article

Nexus between Socioeconomic Factors, Indigenous Chicken Productivity, and Community-defined Livelihood Outcomes among Rural Communities in Kericho County, Kenya

George M. Kere, Joseph Kipkorir Cheruiyot, Michael E. Omunyin, Joash K. Kibett
article en

Abstract

Rural poultry rearing is common worldwide, particularly in developing countries, where indigenous chicken (IC) dominates and serves as a vital asset for resource-poor households. Despite their importance, backyard chickens face productivity challenges such as inconsistent nutrition, poor health management, and fluctuating environmental conditions. While numerous studies address these technical challenges, socioeconomic contexts are often overlooked. This study investigated the nexus between socioeconomic factors, IC productivity, and community-defined livelihood outcomes among rural communities in Kericho County, Kenya. Grounded in contextualism, the study pursued three objectives: (1) examine socioeconomic determinants of IC productivity, (2) analyze the relationship between IC productivity and community-defined livelihood outcomes, using a participatory approach, and (3) explore the nexus between socioeconomic factors, IC productivity, and livelihood outcomes. A community-based participatory action research framework was employed, combining qualitative data from focus group discussions and quantitative data from a cross-sectional survey. Sample size was determined by Yamane’s formula and purposive and stratified random sampling techniques were used to select participants. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential methods; SPSS version 27 aided quantitative analysis. Findings indicated that IC productivity is influenced by farmers’ socioeconomic factors; access to information, knowledge-seeking behaviour, social networking, enterprise diversity, household size, flock size, and age. Productivity measures; egg production and chick survival rates, varied significantly across livelihood outcome categories based on Welch ANOVA; F (3, 38.31) = 15.68, p < .001, ƞ2 = .124 and F (3, 36.545) = 34.875, p < .001, ƞ2 = .197 respectively, but self-reported profitability did not (p > .05). Challenges revolved around economic powerlessness and weak information-seeking behaviour. The study concludes that socioeconomic attributes, including information-seeking and social networking, are integral to the productivity of Indigenous chickens and community-defined livelihood outcomes. It recommends that stakeholders and policy-makers support integrating farmer groups into broader networks to foster collaboration and improve productivity.

East African Journal of Agriculture and BiotechnologyVol. 8(1)
University of Kabianga (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Livestock and Poultry Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.