Cluster-Specific Propensity Score Weighting To Stabilize Treatment Effect Estimation

This paper introduces a novel method for estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) in observational causal inference studies by calculating cluster-specific ATEs and taking a weighted average across clusters. Instead of directly applying Inverse Propensity Weighting (IPW), this approach leverages clustering to address issues such as positivity violations and extreme weights, which often arise when propensity scores are near 0 or 1. Each cluster is formed based on covariates, and the ATE is estimated for each cluster using propensity score weighting. The overall ATE is then calculated as a weighted average of the cluster-specific ATEs, where the weights are based on the average propensity score within each cluster. This method effectively captures treatment effect heterogeneity and mitigates the instability caused by extreme individual weights. Simulations on synthetic data and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of this method in producing more stable and reliable treatment effect estimates compared to traditional IPW.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning and Applications An International Journal
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5121/mlaij.2025.12103
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cluster-Specific Propensity Score Weighting To Stabilize Treatment Effect Estimation

Hardev Ranglani
Machine Learning and Applications An International Journal
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Cluster-Specific Propensity Score Weighting To Stabilize Treatment Effect Estimation

Hardev Ranglani
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel method for estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) in observational causal inference studies by calculating cluster-specific ATEs and taking a weighted average across clusters. Instead of directly applying Inverse Propensity Weighting (IPW), this approach leverages clustering to address issues such as positivity violations and extreme weights, which often arise when propensity scores are near 0 or 1. Each cluster is formed based on covariates, and the ATE is estimated for each cluster using propensity score weighting. The overall ATE is then calculated as a weighted average of the cluster-specific ATEs, where the weights are based on the average propensity score within each cluster. This method effectively captures treatment effect heterogeneity and mitigates the instability caused by extreme individual weights. Simulations on synthetic data and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of this method in producing more stable and reliable treatment effect estimates compared to traditional IPW.

Machine Learning and Applications An International JournalVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cluster-Specific Propensity Score Weighting To Stabilize Treatment Effect Estimation — Hardev Ranglani · Machine Learning and Applications An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS