RESISTING THE FAR-RIGHT: EXPLAINING DIVERGENT COUNTERMOBILIZATION TRAJECTORIES IN TWO GERMAN CITIES*

This article explains the divergent trajectories of anti-far-right mobilization in two German cities: the campaign against the extreme-right movement Pegida in Dresden and its offshoot, Legida, in Leipzig. Drawing on a comparative case study, we argue that the interplay of three city-specific features—namely, activist coalitions, the city’s political identity, and elite support—account for the strength and cohesion of the countermobilization in Leipzig compared to Dresden. Our findings extend the growing literature on civil-society opposition to far-right actors by emphasizing the fundamental relevance of place for understanding variations in anti-far-right resistance. Local city contexts—understood as self-reinforcing combinations of mobilization structures and subjective understandings of contentious action—enable, constrain, and form the course of countermobilization campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mobilization An International Quarterly
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-30-1-13
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESISTING THE FAR-RIGHT: EXPLAINING DIVERGENT COUNTERMOBILIZATION TRAJECTORIES IN TWO GERMAN CITIES*

Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, Sebastian Haunss, Jan Matti Dollbaum
4 citations
Mobilization An International Quarterly
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
34.09
article

RESISTING THE FAR-RIGHT: EXPLAINING DIVERGENT COUNTERMOBILIZATION TRAJECTORIES IN TWO GERMAN CITIES*

Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, Sebastian Haunss, Jan Matti Dollbaum
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article explains the divergent trajectories of anti-far-right mobilization in two German cities: the campaign against the extreme-right movement Pegida in Dresden and its offshoot, Legida, in Leipzig. Drawing on a comparative case study, we argue that the interplay of three city-specific features—namely, activist coalitions, the city’s political identity, and elite support—account for the strength and cohesion of the countermobilization in Leipzig compared to Dresden. Our findings extend the growing literature on civil-society opposition to far-right actors by emphasizing the fundamental relevance of place for understanding variations in anti-far-right resistance. Local city contexts—understood as self-reinforcing combinations of mobilization structures and subjective understandings of contentious action—enable, constrain, and form the course of countermobilization campaigns.

Mobilization An International QuarterlyVol. 30(1)
Hochschule Bielefeld (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RESISTING THE FAR-RIGHT: EXPLAINING DIVERGENT COUNTERMOBILIZATION TRAJECTORIES IN TWO GERMAN CITIES* — Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, et al. · Mobilization An International Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS