[MSB-57] Surgically Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) in Patients Younger Than One Year

Objective: This study aimed to present our experience with surgically implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in infants. Methods: Thirty-eight infants (18 males, 20 females; mean age: 155.6±102.2 days; range, 1 to 343 days) who underwent a surgical procedure to implant CIEDs between 2014 and 2024 were included in the study. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Results: The mean weight was 5.27±1.99 kg (range, 2.1 to 9 kg). Twenty-four (63%) patients required CIED due to complete atrioventricular block after pediatric heart surgery. In five (13%) patients, the indication was congenital complete atrioventricular block. Remaining 10 (24%) patients had a long QT, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, and cardiomyopathy. Pacemaker configuration was VVI in 31 (81.5%) patients, ICD in three (8%) patients, CRT in two (5.25%), and DDD in two (5.25%). The median follow-up was five years (range, 1 to 10 years). There were no deaths. A total of 12 reoperations were required in seven (18.4%) patients when pacemaker generator replacements were excluded. Five reoperations were related to lead fracture and revision. The remaining seven reoperations were to either upgrade or downgrade pacemaker configurations. Conclusion: In patients younger than one year, surgical implantation of CIEDs represents a safe procedure with reasonably acceptable outcomes in the mid-term follow-up. However, reoperations are inevitable, and appropriate reinterventions depend on close device surveillance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5606/e-cvsi.2024.msb-57
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[MSB-57] Surgically Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) in Patients Younger Than One Year

Şafak Alpat, İlker Ertuğrul, Tevfik Karagöz, Mustafa Yılmaz et al.
Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

[MSB-57] Surgically Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) in Patients Younger Than One Year

Şafak Alpat, İlker Ertuğrul, Tevfik Karagöz, Mustafa Yılmaz, Abdüsselam Çorak
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to present our experience with surgically implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in infants. Methods: Thirty-eight infants (18 males, 20 females; mean age: 155.6±102.2 days; range, 1 to 343 days) who underwent a surgical procedure to implant CIEDs between 2014 and 2024 were included in the study. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Results: The mean weight was 5.27±1.99 kg (range, 2.1 to 9 kg). Twenty-four (63%) patients required CIED due to complete atrioventricular block after pediatric heart surgery. In five (13%) patients, the indication was congenital complete atrioventricular block. Remaining 10 (24%) patients had a long QT, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, and cardiomyopathy. Pacemaker configuration was VVI in 31 (81.5%) patients, ICD in three (8%) patients, CRT in two (5.25%), and DDD in two (5.25%). The median follow-up was five years (range, 1 to 10 years). There were no deaths. A total of 12 reoperations were required in seven (18.4%) patients when pacemaker generator replacements were excluded. Five reoperations were related to lead fracture and revision. The remaining seven reoperations were to either upgrade or downgrade pacemaker configurations. Conclusion: In patients younger than one year, surgical implantation of CIEDs represents a safe procedure with reasonably acceptable outcomes in the mid-term follow-up. However, reoperations are inevitable, and appropriate reinterventions depend on close device surveillance.

Cardiovascular Surgery and InterventionsVol. 11(100)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.