Instructional Supervision of Master Teachers: Its Critical Role in Advancing Teachers’ and Learners’ Performance

This study examined the role of master teachers in improving the performance of proficient teachers and learners, focusing on instructional supervision across Key Result Areas (KRAs) during the school year 2024-2025. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 95 master teachers and 75 school heads across public elementary schools in the second district of Surigao del Sur. The study also assessed elementary teachers’ Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings and learners’ academic performance through Mean Percentage Scores (MPS). Results indicated that instructional supervision was highly manifested across all KRAs, with an overall mean score of 4.449. The highest-rated domain was Professional Engagement, Personal Growth, and Professional Development (M=4.515), highlighting educators’ commitment to continuous learning. However, correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship (p>0.05) between teachers’ performance and learners’ academic performance. This finding suggests that while instructional supervision is well-practiced, it does not directly influence measurable improvements in teacher performance or student learning outcomes. Other factors, such as teacher motivation, instructional strategies, and student engagement, may have a more substantial impact. Meanwhile, one-way ANOVA results showed significant differences (p<0.05) in instructional supervision levels based on school type pointing to variations in support and professional development opportunities. These findings highlight the need to reassess the effectiveness of current instructional supervision practices and explore complementary strategies that better support teacher effectiveness and student success. Future applications of this study include refining school-based professional development models and informing DepEd policies on teacher evaluation and supervision to ensure a more holistic approach to improving educational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Education and Technology
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i2.4399
Primary Topic
Education and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instructional Supervision of Master Teachers: Its Critical Role in Advancing Teachers’ and Learners’ Performance

Mauricio Reyes, Jane Oropa
American Journal of Education and Technology
Education and Communication Studies
article

Instructional Supervision of Master Teachers: Its Critical Role in Advancing Teachers’ and Learners’ Performance

Mauricio Reyes, Jane Oropa
article en

Abstract

This study examined the role of master teachers in improving the performance of proficient teachers and learners, focusing on instructional supervision across Key Result Areas (KRAs) during the school year 2024-2025. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 95 master teachers and 75 school heads across public elementary schools in the second district of Surigao del Sur. The study also assessed elementary teachers’ Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings and learners’ academic performance through Mean Percentage Scores (MPS). Results indicated that instructional supervision was highly manifested across all KRAs, with an overall mean score of 4.449. The highest-rated domain was Professional Engagement, Personal Growth, and Professional Development (M=4.515), highlighting educators’ commitment to continuous learning. However, correlation analysis revealed no significant relationship (p>0.05) between teachers’ performance and learners’ academic performance. This finding suggests that while instructional supervision is well-practiced, it does not directly influence measurable improvements in teacher performance or student learning outcomes. Other factors, such as teacher motivation, instructional strategies, and student engagement, may have a more substantial impact. Meanwhile, one-way ANOVA results showed significant differences (p<0.05) in instructional supervision levels based on school type pointing to variations in support and professional development opportunities. These findings highlight the need to reassess the effectiveness of current instructional supervision practices and explore complementary strategies that better support teacher effectiveness and student success. Future applications of this study include refining school-based professional development models and informing DepEd policies on teacher evaluation and supervision to ensure a more holistic approach to improving educational outcomes.

American Journal of Education and TechnologyVol. 4(2)
North Eastern Mindanao State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Education and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Instructional Supervision of Master Teachers: Its Critical Role in Advancing Teachers’ and Learners’ Performance — Mauricio Reyes, Jane Oropa · American Journal of Education and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS