New Method of Impact Localization on Plate-like Structures Using Deep Learning and Wavelet Transform

This paper presents a new methodology for localizing impact events on plate-like structures using a proposed two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) and received impact signals. A network of four piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) was installed on the tested plate to acquire impact signals. These signals consisted of reflection waves that provided valuable information about impact events. In this methodology, each of the received signals was divided into several equal segments. Then, a wavelet transform (WT)-based time-frequency analysis was used for processing each segment signal. The generated WT diagrams of these segments' signals were cropped and resized using MATLAB code to be used as input image datasets to train, validate, and test the proposed CNN model. Two scenarios were adopted from PAWS transducers. First, two sensors were positioned in two corners of the plate, while, in the second scenario, four sensors were used to monitor and collect the signals. Eight datasets were collected and reshaped from these two scenarios. These datasets presented the signals of two, three, four, and five impacts. The model's performance was evaluated using four metrics: confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. The proposed model demonstrated exceptional performance by accurately localizing all of the impact points of the first scenario and 99% of the second scenario. The main limitation of the proposed model is how to differentiate the data samples that have similar features. From our point of view, the similarity challenge arose from two factors: the segmentation interval and the impact distance. First, applying the segmenting procedure to the PWAS signals led to an increase in the number of data samples. The procedure segmented each PWAS signal to 30 samples with equal intervals, regardless of the features of the signal. Segmenting and transforming different PWAS signals into image-based data points led to data samples that had similar features. Second, some of the impacts had a close distance to the PWAS sensors, which resulted in similar segmented signals. Therefore, the second scenario was more challenging for the proposed model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25061926
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Method of Impact Localization on Plate-like Structures Using Deep Learning and Wavelet Transform

Asaad Migot, Ahmed Saaudi, Victor Giurgiutiu
1 citations
Sensors
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
0.86
article

New Method of Impact Localization on Plate-like Structures Using Deep Learning and Wavelet Transform

Asaad Migot, Ahmed Saaudi, Victor Giurgiutiu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a new methodology for localizing impact events on plate-like structures using a proposed two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) and received impact signals. A network of four piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) was installed on the tested plate to acquire impact signals. These signals consisted of reflection waves that provided valuable information about impact events. In this methodology, each of the received signals was divided into several equal segments. Then, a wavelet transform (WT)-based time-frequency analysis was used for processing each segment signal. The generated WT diagrams of these segments' signals were cropped and resized using MATLAB code to be used as input image datasets to train, validate, and test the proposed CNN model. Two scenarios were adopted from PAWS transducers. First, two sensors were positioned in two corners of the plate, while, in the second scenario, four sensors were used to monitor and collect the signals. Eight datasets were collected and reshaped from these two scenarios. These datasets presented the signals of two, three, four, and five impacts. The model's performance was evaluated using four metrics: confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. The proposed model demonstrated exceptional performance by accurately localizing all of the impact points of the first scenario and 99% of the second scenario. The main limitation of the proposed model is how to differentiate the data samples that have similar features. From our point of view, the similarity challenge arose from two factors: the segmentation interval and the impact distance. First, applying the segmenting procedure to the PWAS signals led to an increase in the number of data samples. The procedure segmented each PWAS signal to 30 samples with equal intervals, regardless of the features of the signal. Segmenting and transforming different PWAS signals into image-based data points led to data samples that had similar features. Second, some of the impacts had a close distance to the PWAS sensors, which resulted in similar segmented signals. Therefore, the second scenario was more challenging for the proposed model.

SensorsVol. 25(6)
University of South Carolina (US), Thi Qar University (IQ), Al-Muthanna University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.