Non-native Douglas fir seedlings outcompete native Norway spruce, silver fir and Scots pine under dry and nutrient-poor conditions

Climate change is expected to significantly alter forest ecosystems, reducing the suitability of the key economic tree species Norway spruce (<i>Picea abies</i>) and European beech (<i>Fagus sylvatica</i>) in low- and mid-elevation forests of Central Europe. As these species face increasing pressures from drought, storms, and pests, it is crucial to identify alternative tree species that are economically viable and capable of maintaining primary ecosystem services. This study investigated the potential of Douglas fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>), a non-native conifer, to establish from seed and compete with native broadleaf and conifer species during the early regeneration stage under differing resource availabilities. We assessed the growth performance and phenotypic plasticity of Douglas fir seedlings over three years in a controlled common-garden experiment. Seedlings of Douglas fir, along with seven native species - Norway spruce, silver fir (<i>Abies alba</i>), Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i>), European beech, pedunculate oak (<i>Quercus robur</i>), sessile oak (<i>Q. petraea</i>), and sycamore (<i>Acer pseudoplatanus</i>) - were grown for three years under factorial combinations of high and low availabilities of light, nutrients, and water. Seedling height, biomass allocation to shoots and roots and phenotypic plasticity of these traits were measured to evaluate the competitive ability of individual species and their potential to adapt to changing environmental conditions. While Douglas fir seedlings exhibited strong growth performance compared to the conifers Norway spruce and silver fir, their biomass production and height growth was considerably lower than that of the broadleaved sycamore and beech. However, Douglas fir's height growth rate in the third year exceeded all species except sycamore. This was particularly pronounced under dry and/or nutrient-poor conditions, indicating a potential competitive advantage under expected future climatic conditions. In agreement with field studies, our results indicate that non-native Douglas fir may sustainably establish in dry, nutrient poor European lowland forests due to its superior early growth performance under these conditions and the high phenotypic plasticity, of its root system. This holds especially in situations where the species competes with other conifers, while its ability to successfully compete with broadleaves appears to be largely restricted to nutrient-poor sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1546250
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-native Douglas fir seedlings outcompete native Norway spruce, silver fir and Scots pine under dry and nutrient-poor conditions

Barbara Moser, Daniel Scherrer, Thomas Wohlgemuth, Christoph Bachofen et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Forest ecology and management
2.31
article

Non-native Douglas fir seedlings outcompete native Norway spruce, silver fir and Scots pine under dry and nutrient-poor conditions

Barbara Moser, Daniel Scherrer, Thomas Wohlgemuth, Christoph Bachofen, Esther R. Frei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate change is expected to significantly alter forest ecosystems, reducing the suitability of the key economic tree species Norway spruce (<i>Picea abies</i>) and European beech (<i>Fagus sylvatica</i>) in low- and mid-elevation forests of Central Europe. As these species face increasing pressures from drought, storms, and pests, it is crucial to identify alternative tree species that are economically viable and capable of maintaining primary ecosystem services. This study investigated the potential of Douglas fir (<i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i>), a non-native conifer, to establish from seed and compete with native broadleaf and conifer species during the early regeneration stage under differing resource availabilities. We assessed the growth performance and phenotypic plasticity of Douglas fir seedlings over three years in a controlled common-garden experiment. Seedlings of Douglas fir, along with seven native species - Norway spruce, silver fir (<i>Abies alba</i>), Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i>), European beech, pedunculate oak (<i>Quercus robur</i>), sessile oak (<i>Q. petraea</i>), and sycamore (<i>Acer pseudoplatanus</i>) - were grown for three years under factorial combinations of high and low availabilities of light, nutrients, and water. Seedling height, biomass allocation to shoots and roots and phenotypic plasticity of these traits were measured to evaluate the competitive ability of individual species and their potential to adapt to changing environmental conditions. While Douglas fir seedlings exhibited strong growth performance compared to the conifers Norway spruce and silver fir, their biomass production and height growth was considerably lower than that of the broadleaved sycamore and beech. However, Douglas fir's height growth rate in the third year exceeded all species except sycamore. This was particularly pronounced under dry and/or nutrient-poor conditions, indicating a potential competitive advantage under expected future climatic conditions. In agreement with field studies, our results indicate that non-native Douglas fir may sustainably establish in dry, nutrient poor European lowland forests due to its superior early growth performance under these conditions and the high phenotypic plasticity, of its root system. This holds especially in situations where the species competes with other conifers, while its ability to successfully compete with broadleaves appears to be largely restricted to nutrient-poor sites.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Forest ecology and management
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.