Our Fascination, the Law: On Similarities, Differences, and the Future of Law and Society Scholarship: Asian Law and Society Association 2023 Presidential Address

Abstract This inaugural presidential address of the Asian Law and Society Association features three recently published monographs to draw attention to research by the next generation of scholars and to show how they contribute to the field. Although the three books differ in terms of focus, methods, and findings, they share a hallmark of law and society, that is, they investigate practices, beliefs, and objects that are often taken for granted. At the same time, the three studies arrive at dissimilar conclusions about law, which reflects another unifying hallmark of law and society—its diversity. Together, the inconsistent findings expose the many profiles of law and demonstrate its fascinating nature. They remind us that we do not yet know the intricacies of law, and we need all kinds of law and society scholarships—on Asian societies and elsewhere—to continue advancing the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Law and Society
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2025.2
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Our Fascination, the Law: On Similarities, Differences, and the Future of Law and Society Scholarship: Asian Law and Society Association 2023 Presidential Address

Lynette J. Chua
1 links
Asian Journal of Law and Society
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Our Fascination, the Law: On Similarities, Differences, and the Future of Law and Society Scholarship: Asian Law and Society Association 2023 Presidential Address

Lynette J. Chua
article en

Abstract

Abstract This inaugural presidential address of the Asian Law and Society Association features three recently published monographs to draw attention to research by the next generation of scholars and to show how they contribute to the field. Although the three books differ in terms of focus, methods, and findings, they share a hallmark of law and society, that is, they investigate practices, beliefs, and objects that are often taken for granted. At the same time, the three studies arrive at dissimilar conclusions about law, which reflects another unifying hallmark of law and society—its diversity. Together, the inconsistent findings expose the many profiles of law and demonstrate its fascinating nature. They remind us that we do not yet know the intricacies of law, and we need all kinds of law and society scholarships—on Asian societies and elsewhere—to continue advancing the field.

Asian Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 12(1)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.