ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China

Firm value reflects a company’s market competitiveness, while ESG controversies indicate its ESG risks. This study aims to examine the impact of ESG controversies on firm value and its underlying mechanisms. Using a panel dataset of 851 non-financial firms listed in China’s A-share market between 2010 and 2022, this study investigates the relationship between ESG controversies and firm value using a two-way fixed-effects model. The analysis shows that ESG controversies impair firm value. This relationship remains robust after conducting the Heckman test, 2SLS methods, and heteroskedasticity tests. Further mediation analysis indicates that ESG controversies negatively affect firm value through lower levels of green innovation, total factor productivity, and financing constraints. In addition, the study examines the moderating effects of social performance, environmental performance, and analyst forecast bias. Finally, a heterogeneity analysis was conducted. These findings provide new perspectives for understanding the complex dynamics between ESG controversies and firm value, essential for strengthening the ESG rating framework and promoting sustainable corporate development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062750
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China

Shu‐Yun Ma, Tao Ma
6 citations
Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
article

ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Evidence from A-Share Companies in China

Shu‐Yun Ma, Tao Ma
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Firm value reflects a company’s market competitiveness, while ESG controversies indicate its ESG risks. This study aims to examine the impact of ESG controversies on firm value and its underlying mechanisms. Using a panel dataset of 851 non-financial firms listed in China’s A-share market between 2010 and 2022, this study investigates the relationship between ESG controversies and firm value using a two-way fixed-effects model. The analysis shows that ESG controversies impair firm value. This relationship remains robust after conducting the Heckman test, 2SLS methods, and heteroskedasticity tests. Further mediation analysis indicates that ESG controversies negatively affect firm value through lower levels of green innovation, total factor productivity, and financing constraints. In addition, the study examines the moderating effects of social performance, environmental performance, and analyst forecast bias. Finally, a heterogeneity analysis was conducted. These findings provide new perspectives for understanding the complex dynamics between ESG controversies and firm value, essential for strengthening the ESG rating framework and promoting sustainable corporate development.

SustainabilityVol. 17(6)
Fudan University (CN), State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
13.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.