Mind the gap: questioning the existence of a ‘knowledge deficit’ in conservation social media message evaluation by scientist, science-trained, and general public audience groups

Conservation communication tends to assume a knowledge gap between scientists and target audiences and focuses more on education rather than invitational forms of communication. Known as the knowledge deficit approach to science communication, this approach assumes a significant gap between the public and science-trained professionals and hopes to overcome that gap through communicating ‘better’ facts. Through the use of focus group data, this study examines whether a knowledge deficit exists between scientist, science-trained, and general public audience groups’ understanding of conservation concepts and evaluation and interpretation of conservation social media messages. We show that a significant knowledge deficit does not exist between these groups, and furthermore show between group overlap on key themes surrounding the presentation of social media messages. Altogether this suggests that adopting other styles of communication may enhance engagement with conservation issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2480727
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the gap: questioning the existence of a ‘knowledge deficit’ in conservation social media message evaluation by scientist, science-trained, and general public audience groups

Alina C. Fisher, Sarah Jacobs, Chaseten Remillard
1 citations
Cogent Social Sciences
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

Mind the gap: questioning the existence of a ‘knowledge deficit’ in conservation social media message evaluation by scientist, science-trained, and general public audience groups

Alina C. Fisher, Sarah Jacobs, Chaseten Remillard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conservation communication tends to assume a knowledge gap between scientists and target audiences and focuses more on education rather than invitational forms of communication. Known as the knowledge deficit approach to science communication, this approach assumes a significant gap between the public and science-trained professionals and hopes to overcome that gap through communicating ‘better’ facts. Through the use of focus group data, this study examines whether a knowledge deficit exists between scientist, science-trained, and general public audience groups’ understanding of conservation concepts and evaluation and interpretation of conservation social media messages. We show that a significant knowledge deficit does not exist between these groups, and furthermore show between group overlap on key themes surrounding the presentation of social media messages. Altogether this suggests that adopting other styles of communication may enhance engagement with conservation issues.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
University of Victoria (CA), Royal Roads University (CA)
Mitacs
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.