Statistical Filtering of Random Measurement Errors

In life, we often have to take into account the accuracy of measurements. There is obviously a desire to have the measured value as accurately as possible. This applies to both static and dynamic measurements. Measurements may be made using one or more meters and involve errors that may be systematic or random. The usual approach to obtaining a more accurate value of a measured parameter is the averaging method. This is a simple and quite effective method, especially if the measurements are equally accurate. If there are n measurements, then the averaging method is the addition of n measurements with the same weighting coefficients. The larger n, the more accurate the estimate will be. But with different-precision measurements, the result may not be optimal. To obtain an optimal estimate (estimates with minimal error variance) for multi-precision measurements, the weighting coefficients must take into account their statistical accuracy. Optimal weighting coefficients should ensure a minimum variance of the estimation error. This is the method of statistical filtering of random errors. Statistical filtering of random errors is also applicable for multidimensional problems. For example, its special case is the so-called “Kalman filter”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational nanotechnology
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2313-223x-2024-11-5-11-19
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Filtering of Random Measurement Errors

Andrej Bogdanov, V.M. IVANYUGIN
Computational nanotechnology
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Statistical Filtering of Random Measurement Errors

Andrej Bogdanov, V.M. IVANYUGIN
article en

Abstract

In life, we often have to take into account the accuracy of measurements. There is obviously a desire to have the measured value as accurately as possible. This applies to both static and dynamic measurements. Measurements may be made using one or more meters and involve errors that may be systematic or random. The usual approach to obtaining a more accurate value of a measured parameter is the averaging method. This is a simple and quite effective method, especially if the measurements are equally accurate. If there are n measurements, then the averaging method is the addition of n measurements with the same weighting coefficients. The larger n, the more accurate the estimate will be. But with different-precision measurements, the result may not be optimal. To obtain an optimal estimate (estimates with minimal error variance) for multi-precision measurements, the weighting coefficients must take into account their statistical accuracy. Optimal weighting coefficients should ensure a minimum variance of the estimation error. This is the method of statistical filtering of random errors. Statistical filtering of random errors is also applicable for multidimensional problems. For example, its special case is the so-called “Kalman filter”.

Computational nanotechnologyVol. 11(5)
MIREA - Russian Technological University (RU), Siberian Academy of Finance and Banking (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Statistical Filtering of Random Measurement Errors — Andrej Bogdanov, V.M. IVANYUGIN · Computational nanotechnology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS