A Rotational Cultivation System for Indoor-Grown Lettuce: Feasibility in Terms of Yields, Resource Efficiency, Quality, and Postharvest Storage Capacity

Indoor farming in plant factories with artificial lighting (PFAL) offers optimized growing conditions and higher water, light, and land surface use efficiencies compared to greenhouses or open field agriculture but faces challenges related to energy consumption. The objective of this work is to evaluate the feasibility of using a rotational cultivation system for indoor-grown lettuce production. We compare a rotational cultivation system to a horizontal control cultivation system in terms of yields, resource efficiency, quality at harvest, and postharvest storage capacity. No significant differences were observed in yields, water use efficiency, light use efficiency, or postharvest storage capacity between the systems. Energy and land surface use efficiencies were higher in the rotational cultivation system compared to the control and consistent with the literature. However, a slight trend toward lower fresh and dry weights throughout the cultivation period in the rotational system was noted, correlating with reduced net photosynthesis during the first two hours and at the end of the lighting period. This effect was attributed to decreased stomatal conductance and photosystem II efficiency. Furthermore, the rotational cultivation system modified the quality by modifying the global polyphenol profile of the lettuce compared to the control. Based on yields and efficiencies, we show the feasibility of using a rotational cultivation system for indoor lettuce production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030744
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Rotational Cultivation System for Indoor-Grown Lettuce: Feasibility in Terms of Yields, Resource Efficiency, Quality, and Postharvest Storage Capacity

Olivier Chevallier, Vincent Truffault, Véronique Vidal, Cédric Dresch et al.
1 citations
Agronomy
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
1.19
article

A Rotational Cultivation System for Indoor-Grown Lettuce: Feasibility in Terms of Yields, Resource Efficiency, Quality, and Postharvest Storage Capacity

Olivier Chevallier, Vincent Truffault, Véronique Vidal, Cédric Dresch, Huguette Sallanon, Séverine Suchail, Florence Charles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Indoor farming in plant factories with artificial lighting (PFAL) offers optimized growing conditions and higher water, light, and land surface use efficiencies compared to greenhouses or open field agriculture but faces challenges related to energy consumption. The objective of this work is to evaluate the feasibility of using a rotational cultivation system for indoor-grown lettuce production. We compare a rotational cultivation system to a horizontal control cultivation system in terms of yields, resource efficiency, quality at harvest, and postharvest storage capacity. No significant differences were observed in yields, water use efficiency, light use efficiency, or postharvest storage capacity between the systems. Energy and land surface use efficiencies were higher in the rotational cultivation system compared to the control and consistent with the literature. However, a slight trend toward lower fresh and dry weights throughout the cultivation period in the rotational system was noted, correlating with reduced net photosynthesis during the first two hours and at the end of the lighting period. This effect was attributed to decreased stomatal conductance and photosystem II efficiency. Furthermore, the rotational cultivation system modified the quality by modifying the global polyphenol profile of the lettuce compared to the control. Based on yields and efficiencies, we show the feasibility of using a rotational cultivation system for indoor lettuce production.

AgronomyVol. 15(3)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Agilent Technologies (United States) (US), Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Sécurité et Qualité des Produits d'Origine Végétale (FR), Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale (FR)
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.