Influence of Tree Community Characteristics on Carbon Sinks in Urban Parks: A Case Study of Xinyang, China

Cities are major contributors to global carbon emissions; however, urban parks offer substantial potential for carbon sinks. Research on factors influencing carbon capture in urban park vegetation is still limited. This study investigates 81 urban parks in Xinyang, Henan Province, to quantify woody plant carbon storage (CS) and sequestration (CSG). By surveying all vegetation types and quantities in these parks, along with factors like park attributes, community structure, biodiversity, spatial distribution, woody plant connectivity, and spatial complexity, we create statistical models for CS and CSG. The results indicate that the average carbon storage density (CSD) in Xinyang’s urban parks is 4.01 kg/m2, while the carbon sequestration density (CSGD) is 0.39 kg·C·m2·yr−1. The dominant tree species are Ligustrum lucidum, Osmanthus fragrans, and Lagerstroemia indica, while species with higher carbon sequestration potential, such as Glyptostrobus pensilis, Populus deltoides, and Albizia kalkora, reveal a discrepancy between common and high-sequestration species. The study shows that park characteristics, community structure, and biodiversity are key factors impacting urban carbon sink capacity. By analyzing the relationship between these factors and carbon sinks in urban park vegetation, we create a comprehensive framework for assessing tree CS and CSG, offering quantitative support to improve carbon capture in urban parks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030653
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Tree Community Characteristics on Carbon Sinks in Urban Parks: A Case Study of Xinyang, China

Yongge Hu, Honglin Zhang, Peihao Song, Qian Ren et al.
3 citations
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
article

Influence of Tree Community Characteristics on Carbon Sinks in Urban Parks: A Case Study of Xinyang, China

Yongge Hu, Honglin Zhang, Peihao Song, Qian Ren, Nalin Dong, Ruizhen He, Guohang Tian, Shidong Ge, Yuyang Zhou, Hua Wang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cities are major contributors to global carbon emissions; however, urban parks offer substantial potential for carbon sinks. Research on factors influencing carbon capture in urban park vegetation is still limited. This study investigates 81 urban parks in Xinyang, Henan Province, to quantify woody plant carbon storage (CS) and sequestration (CSG). By surveying all vegetation types and quantities in these parks, along with factors like park attributes, community structure, biodiversity, spatial distribution, woody plant connectivity, and spatial complexity, we create statistical models for CS and CSG. The results indicate that the average carbon storage density (CSD) in Xinyang’s urban parks is 4.01 kg/m2, while the carbon sequestration density (CSGD) is 0.39 kg·C·m2·yr−1. The dominant tree species are Ligustrum lucidum, Osmanthus fragrans, and Lagerstroemia indica, while species with higher carbon sequestration potential, such as Glyptostrobus pensilis, Populus deltoides, and Albizia kalkora, reveal a discrepancy between common and high-sequestration species. The study shows that park characteristics, community structure, and biodiversity are key factors impacting urban carbon sink capacity. By analyzing the relationship between these factors and carbon sinks in urban park vegetation, we create a comprehensive framework for assessing tree CS and CSG, offering quantitative support to improve carbon capture in urban parks.

LandVol. 14(3)
Xinyang Normal University (CN), Qinghai Normal University (CN), Henan Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.