‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder

Abstract President Donald Trump’s communication style is idiosyncratic, with a conversational but aggressive or threatening tone, hypermasculinity, and lower linguistic complexity ( Reyes 2020 ; Scotto di Carlo 2020 ; Smith and Higgins 2020 ). These unique qualities should set him apart from other US presidents, making him easily recognizable. This study tests whether Americans can recognize Trump, Bush, and Obama based on their quotations. It was predicted partisans could easily identify Trump when reviewing threatening (compared with reassuring or neutral) statements because of his signature style and because anxiety prompts greater deliberation. While liberals and moderates enjoyed some success, conservatives couldn’t distinguish Trump from Obama at any threat level. Findings indicate that partisans fail to reach the same conclusions because they perceive statements differently, suggesting that divergent partisan perspectives begin with early differences in partisan perception. Thus, what’s perceived as “normal” depends upon ideology and the degree of threat, triggered by rhetorical cues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Politics
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder

Aimee Pavia Meader, Matthew Wood Hayes
Journal of Language and Politics
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder

Aimee Pavia Meader, Matthew Wood Hayes
article en

Abstract

Abstract President Donald Trump’s communication style is idiosyncratic, with a conversational but aggressive or threatening tone, hypermasculinity, and lower linguistic complexity ( Reyes 2020 ; Scotto di Carlo 2020 ; Smith and Higgins 2020 ). These unique qualities should set him apart from other US presidents, making him easily recognizable. This study tests whether Americans can recognize Trump, Bush, and Obama based on their quotations. It was predicted partisans could easily identify Trump when reviewing threatening (compared with reassuring or neutral) statements because of his signature style and because anxiety prompts greater deliberation. While liberals and moderates enjoyed some success, conservatives couldn’t distinguish Trump from Obama at any threat level. Findings indicate that partisans fail to reach the same conclusions because they perceive statements differently, suggesting that divergent partisan perspectives begin with early differences in partisan perception. Thus, what’s perceived as “normal” depends upon ideology and the degree of threat, triggered by rhetorical cues.

Journal of Language and Politics
Winthrop University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder — Aimee Pavia Meader, Matthew Wood Hayes · Journal of Language and Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS