Investigation of concrete constitutive models for predicting the response, damage, and residual capacity of reinforced concrete beams subject to low velocity impact

Low velocity impact loading from accidental collisions is a common hazard for reinforced concrete components and structures used in infrastructure applications. Both the design of resilience measures and post-event forensic assessments of such structures can be supported using finite element analysis with advanced concrete constitutive models, however comparative benchmarking of available models to multiple experiments has been limited to date. This study comprehensively evaluates the performance of five concrete constitutive models – Continuous Surface Cap Model (CSCM), Karagozian and Case Concrete (KCC), Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT), Concrete Damage Plasticity Model (CDPM), and Winfrith concrete – for analyzing the response of reinforced concrete beams to low-velocity impacts and the subsequent response of the damaged beam to static loading. The investigation includes simulation of five series of drop weight beam experiments conducted on reinforced concrete beams encompassing a range of reinforcement ratios, shear-to-flexural resistance ratios, and impact energies. The performance of each constitutive model is assessed based on comparisons with experimentally observed displacement time histories, damage patterns, and the load–displacement responses of the damaged beams under static loading. The results provide insight into the conditions under which each constitutive model replicates the experimental measurements with strong agreement when initialized with automatic parameter generation and default parameter assignments, while also identifying significant discrepancies in the nature and extent of damage predicted when using each model. This study highlights the importance of concrete constitutive model selection for accurate impact simulation and offers practical guidance for engineers and researchers in choosing appropriate constitutive models for assessing the response of reinforced concrete structures under impact loading. • Concrete constitutive models evaluated for low velocity impact. • Different nature and severity of damage is identified across constitutive models. • Model performance characterized across shear-to-flexural resistance ratios. • Strong correlation to experimental observations obtained with CSCM model. • Residual performance of impact damage beam reflected best with RHT model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105310
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of concrete constitutive models for predicting the response, damage, and residual capacity of reinforced concrete beams subject to low velocity impact

Nicole Braxtan, Matthew J. Whelan, Shen-En Chen, Amirmohammad Samadzad et al.
5 citations
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
4.77
article

Investigation of concrete constitutive models for predicting the response, damage, and residual capacity of reinforced concrete beams subject to low velocity impact

Nicole Braxtan, Matthew J. Whelan, Shen-En Chen, Amirmohammad Samadzad, Seth Cathey
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Low velocity impact loading from accidental collisions is a common hazard for reinforced concrete components and structures used in infrastructure applications. Both the design of resilience measures and post-event forensic assessments of such structures can be supported using finite element analysis with advanced concrete constitutive models, however comparative benchmarking of available models to multiple experiments has been limited to date. This study comprehensively evaluates the performance of five concrete constitutive models – Continuous Surface Cap Model (CSCM), Karagozian and Case Concrete (KCC), Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT), Concrete Damage Plasticity Model (CDPM), and Winfrith concrete – for analyzing the response of reinforced concrete beams to low-velocity impacts and the subsequent response of the damaged beam to static loading. The investigation includes simulation of five series of drop weight beam experiments conducted on reinforced concrete beams encompassing a range of reinforcement ratios, shear-to-flexural resistance ratios, and impact energies. The performance of each constitutive model is assessed based on comparisons with experimentally observed displacement time histories, damage patterns, and the load–displacement responses of the damaged beams under static loading. The results provide insight into the conditions under which each constitutive model replicates the experimental measurements with strong agreement when initialized with automatic parameter generation and default parameter assignments, while also identifying significant discrepancies in the nature and extent of damage predicted when using each model. This study highlights the importance of concrete constitutive model selection for accurate impact simulation and offers practical guidance for engineers and researchers in choosing appropriate constitutive models for assessing the response of reinforced concrete structures under impact loading. • Concrete constitutive models evaluated for low velocity impact. • Different nature and severity of damage is identified across constitutive models. • Model performance characterized across shear-to-flexural resistance ratios. • Strong correlation to experimental observations obtained with CSCM model. • Residual performance of impact damage beam reflected best with RHT model.

International Journal of Impact EngineeringVol. 202
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
4.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.