Relational Moral Demands

Abstract Relational moral theories hold that at least some moral demands are grounded in a relation between individuals. But how should this relation be understood? Most contemporary relational theories have an individuals-first structure: they presuppose that the moral relations that ground moral demands can be explained in terms of relational moral properties of the individuals involved. Radical relationalism, by contrast, has a relations-first structure: it holds that the moral relations that ground relational moral demands are normatively prior to relational moral properties of individuals. My aim in this paper is to argue that some moral demands are radically relational.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoaf001
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational Moral Demands

Fabienne Peter
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Relational Moral Demands

Fabienne Peter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Relational moral theories hold that at least some moral demands are grounded in a relation between individuals. But how should this relation be understood? Most contemporary relational theories have an individuals-first structure: they presuppose that the moral relations that ground moral demands can be explained in terms of relational moral properties of the individuals involved. Radical relationalism, by contrast, has a relations-first structure: it holds that the moral relations that ground relational moral demands are normatively prior to relational moral properties of individuals. My aim in this paper is to argue that some moral demands are radically relational.

Proceedings of the Aristotelian SocietyVol. 125(1)
University of Warwick (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.