Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry and Separation of Powers, Minorities’ Role and Presumption of Innocence

Abstract This study examines the role and limitations of Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry in Spain. These commissions serve as tools for parliamentary oversight, enabling the investigation of public interest matters by the Congress, the Senate or both. Despite their significant powers, including mandatory appearances and the ability to summon citizens, their conclusions are not legally binding. Thus, the study highlights the doctrinal debate on the separation of powers, emphasizing the need to protect fundamental rights, particularly the presumption of innocence. Recent Constitutional Court rulings highlight the necessity for clear procedural guarantees and the non-interference of parliamentary inquiries with judicial processes. The analysis also addresses the political nature of these commissions, their impact on public opinion, the challenges posed by their potential misuse for political maneuvering and the role of minorities. In sum, the findings suggest that regulatory reforms are essential to ensure effective and fair parliamentary oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26668912-bja10097
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry and Separation of Powers, Minorities’ Role and Presumption of Innocence

Carlos González-Tormo
International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
International Law and Human Rights
article

Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry and Separation of Powers, Minorities’ Role and Presumption of Innocence

Carlos González-Tormo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the role and limitations of Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry in Spain. These commissions serve as tools for parliamentary oversight, enabling the investigation of public interest matters by the Congress, the Senate or both. Despite their significant powers, including mandatory appearances and the ability to summon citizens, their conclusions are not legally binding. Thus, the study highlights the doctrinal debate on the separation of powers, emphasizing the need to protect fundamental rights, particularly the presumption of innocence. Recent Constitutional Court rulings highlight the necessity for clear procedural guarantees and the non-interference of parliamentary inquiries with judicial processes. The analysis also addresses the political nature of these commissions, their impact on public opinion, the challenges posed by their potential misuse for political maneuvering and the role of minorities. In sum, the findings suggest that regulatory reforms are essential to ensure effective and fair parliamentary oversight.

International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesVol. 5(1)
Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parliamentary Commissions of Inquiry and Separation of Powers, Minorities’ Role and Presumption of Innocence — Carlos González-Tormo · International Journal of Parliamentary Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS