Defending Behavior and Victimization: Between- and Within-Person Associations

Anti-bullying interventions often encourage peer bystanders to defend their victimized peers. However, concerns have been raised that defending could put youth at risk for being victimized themselves. Despite these concerns, there is limited research on the longitudinal links between defending and victimization. Addressing limitations of previous research, the current study examined bidirectional associations between three types of peer-reported defending (comforting defending, assertive defending, reporting to authority) and (self- and peer-reported) victimization, teasing apart between- and within-person associations using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models. Participants included 5123 Finnish adolescents (45.9% self-identified as a boy; T1 M<sub>age</sub> = 13.06, SD = 1.69, 93.5% born in Finland) in grades 4 to 9. There was a significant, negative between-person association only between comforting defending and self-reported victimization. There were no significant prospective within-person associations between any type of defending and self- or peer-reported victimization. The findings did not indicate that defending was a risk factor for subsequent victimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02168-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending Behavior and Victimization: Between- and Within-Person Associations

Christina Salmivalli, Sarah T. Malamut, Claire F. Garandeau
3 citations
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
article

Defending Behavior and Victimization: Between- and Within-Person Associations

Christina Salmivalli, Sarah T. Malamut, Claire F. Garandeau
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Anti-bullying interventions often encourage peer bystanders to defend their victimized peers. However, concerns have been raised that defending could put youth at risk for being victimized themselves. Despite these concerns, there is limited research on the longitudinal links between defending and victimization. Addressing limitations of previous research, the current study examined bidirectional associations between three types of peer-reported defending (comforting defending, assertive defending, reporting to authority) and (self- and peer-reported) victimization, teasing apart between- and within-person associations using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models. Participants included 5123 Finnish adolescents (45.9% self-identified as a boy; T1 M<sub>age</sub> = 13.06, SD = 1.69, 93.5% born in Finland) in grades 4 to 9. There was a significant, negative between-person association only between comforting defending and self-reported victimization. There were no significant prospective within-person associations between any type of defending and self- or peer-reported victimization. The findings did not indicate that defending was a risk factor for subsequent victimization.

Journal of Youth and AdolescenceVol. 54(7)
University of Turku (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.