The Usability Assessment of PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C Web Application System

The Pharmaceutical Services Program (PSP) has not yet evaluated the usability of the web application system. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) assessment tools give you a quick overview of your system's usability and help you improve it further. The goal of this study was to assess the usability of the PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C systems using SUS and NPS. From April 2019 to July 2020, a survey was conducted using a validated self-administered questionnaire that was prompted after each successful log-out from the PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C systems. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: demographic, device type, and SUS and NPS questionnaire. The mean SUS and NPS scores were computed. The survey was completed by 3,959 PRiSMA users and 811 My.Pharma-C users. The SUS score was interpreted as a grade, adjective, and range of acceptability. The PRiSMA mean SUS score was 70.2 (SD 15.44), indicating a 'Grade C' and 'Good' system. The mean SUS score for My.Pharma-C was 58.2 (SD 15.13), indicating a 'Grade D' and 'OK' system. Users accepted both systems on the basis of their usability. Calculated NPS value for PRiSMA was p=42%, n=49% and d=9%, NPS value=+33, whereas My.Pharma-C p=18%, n=46% and d=36%, NPS value=-18. A positive NPS value for PRiSMA represents the user's readiness to recommend the system to others compared to My.Pharma-C. The findings also established that SUS alone is insufficient and needs to be complemented by another method, such as qualitative instruments. It could help to drill down in depth to understand how to address potentially problematic areas for web application systems and assist in the improvement phases. However, both of the tools are applicable to be used to evaluate the usability of the web application systems that managed by the Pharmaceutical Services Program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.7938
Primary Topic
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Usability Assessment of PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C Web Application System

N. Mohamad Nordin, Nur Wahida Zulkifli, Saidatul Sheeda Ahmad Shukri, Mohd Hadafi Mohd Yasim
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
article

The Usability Assessment of PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C Web Application System

N. Mohamad Nordin, Nur Wahida Zulkifli, Saidatul Sheeda Ahmad Shukri, Mohd Hadafi Mohd Yasim
article en

Abstract

The Pharmaceutical Services Program (PSP) has not yet evaluated the usability of the web application system. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) assessment tools give you a quick overview of your system's usability and help you improve it further. The goal of this study was to assess the usability of the PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C systems using SUS and NPS. From April 2019 to July 2020, a survey was conducted using a validated self-administered questionnaire that was prompted after each successful log-out from the PRiSMA and My.Pharma-C systems. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: demographic, device type, and SUS and NPS questionnaire. The mean SUS and NPS scores were computed. The survey was completed by 3,959 PRiSMA users and 811 My.Pharma-C users. The SUS score was interpreted as a grade, adjective, and range of acceptability. The PRiSMA mean SUS score was 70.2 (SD 15.44), indicating a 'Grade C' and 'Good' system. The mean SUS score for My.Pharma-C was 58.2 (SD 15.13), indicating a 'Grade D' and 'OK' system. Users accepted both systems on the basis of their usability. Calculated NPS value for PRiSMA was p=42%, n=49% and d=9%, NPS value=+33, whereas My.Pharma-C p=18%, n=46% and d=36%, NPS value=-18. A positive NPS value for PRiSMA represents the user's readiness to recommend the system to others compared to My.Pharma-C. The findings also established that SUS alone is insufficient and needs to be complemented by another method, such as qualitative instruments. It could help to drill down in depth to understand how to address potentially problematic areas for web application systems and assist in the improvement phases. However, both of the tools are applicable to be used to evaluate the usability of the web application systems that managed by the Pharmaceutical Services Program.

INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
Ministry of Health (MY), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.