Digital Turn Without Digital Methods? Mapping the Journey of Journalism Studies

Recent years have seen a growing diversity in journalism studies, primarily ascribed to digital transformation in the contemporary context. Analyzing 6,770 publications from the five major journalism journals—*Journalism*, *Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly*, *Journalism Practice*, *Journalism Studies*, and *Digital Journalism*—between 1995 and 2022, we find new evidence that the digital turn is highly visible in journalism studies. Using document co-citation analysis, we first have identified distinct and coherent, yet loosely integrated, research clusters that focus on different journalistic topics, i.e., specialties. Second, we find that digital journalism has not only been integrated into the research agendas within the field but has also formed stand-alone and distinct research clusters. We further show that field structure has developed over the years in response to digital transformation. Yet, digital and computational methods remain in the stark minority compared with the more traditional methods. Our results suggest that journalism studies could benefit from novel inter-cluster communications and methodological innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Journalism
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2480106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Turn Without Digital Methods? Mapping the Journey of Journalism Studies

Yangliu Fan, Christoph Neuberger, Jakob Ohme
1 citations
Digital Journalism
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
article

Digital Turn Without Digital Methods? Mapping the Journey of Journalism Studies

Yangliu Fan, Christoph Neuberger, Jakob Ohme
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing diversity in journalism studies, primarily ascribed to digital transformation in the contemporary context. Analyzing 6,770 publications from the five major journalism journals—*Journalism*, *Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly*, *Journalism Practice*, *Journalism Studies*, and *Digital Journalism*—between 1995 and 2022, we find new evidence that the digital turn is highly visible in journalism studies. Using document co-citation analysis, we first have identified distinct and coherent, yet loosely integrated, research clusters that focus on different journalistic topics, i.e., specialties. Second, we find that digital journalism has not only been integrated into the research agendas within the field but has also formed stand-alone and distinct research clusters. We further show that field structure has developed over the years in response to digital transformation. Yet, digital and computational methods remain in the stark minority compared with the more traditional methods. Our results suggest that journalism studies could benefit from novel inter-cluster communications and methodological innovations.

Digital Journalism
Weizenbaum Institute (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.