Assessment of da Vinci tool and wrist rotations that maximize fluence in photoacoustic-guided surgery: a simulation study

In minimally invasive photoacoustic-guided surgical procedures, one approach to achieve required target illumination is to attach light sources to a surgical tool, such as a scissor tool attached to a da Vinci robot for teleoperated surgeries. However, the tool tip can present an obstacle to light transmission when placed in particular orientations. We quantify the optical fluence resulting from different orientations of the da Vinci scissors tool, using Monte Carlo simulations to measure fluence at varying depths below the tissue surface. A metallic model of the da Vinci scissors tool was placed above simulated tissue in an orientation mimicking a surgical procedure. The da Vinci scissors tool was modeled with pivot points corresponding to two joints: (1) the wrist joint, which is near the base of the scissors tool tip and (2) the scissors joint, around which the scissors open and close, closer to the tip of the tool. Light sources representing optical fibers were placed around the base of the tool, facing the tissue. Simulations were performed with 154 total parameter combinations of different positions (i.e., seven wrist joint rotations using a dedicated wrist joint rotation model, seven scissor joint rotations using a dedicated scissor joint rotation model, with each joint in each model additionally rotated about an orthogonal axis, from 0◦ to -180◦ in 18◦ increments). The resulting fluence was measured in a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) located 1 mm below the tissue surface under the tool. The maximum normalized fluence difference between two simulated tool orientations was 18-21%. These results establish a new simulation framework to enhance our understanding of the impact of specific tool orientations on the fluence delivered to tissue, which has the potential to impact the associated photoacoustic image quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045978
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of da Vinci tool and wrist rotations that maximize fluence in photoacoustic-guided surgery: a simulation study

Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell, G.S. Keene
1 citations
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
0.67
article

Assessment of da Vinci tool and wrist rotations that maximize fluence in photoacoustic-guided surgery: a simulation study

Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell, G.S. Keene
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In minimally invasive photoacoustic-guided surgical procedures, one approach to achieve required target illumination is to attach light sources to a surgical tool, such as a scissor tool attached to a da Vinci robot for teleoperated surgeries. However, the tool tip can present an obstacle to light transmission when placed in particular orientations. We quantify the optical fluence resulting from different orientations of the da Vinci scissors tool, using Monte Carlo simulations to measure fluence at varying depths below the tissue surface. A metallic model of the da Vinci scissors tool was placed above simulated tissue in an orientation mimicking a surgical procedure. The da Vinci scissors tool was modeled with pivot points corresponding to two joints: (1) the wrist joint, which is near the base of the scissors tool tip and (2) the scissors joint, around which the scissors open and close, closer to the tip of the tool. Light sources representing optical fibers were placed around the base of the tool, facing the tissue. Simulations were performed with 154 total parameter combinations of different positions (i.e., seven wrist joint rotations using a dedicated wrist joint rotation model, seven scissor joint rotations using a dedicated scissor joint rotation model, with each joint in each model additionally rotated about an orthogonal axis, from 0◦ to -180◦ in 18◦ increments). The resulting fluence was measured in a 10 mm radius region of interest (ROI) located 1 mm below the tissue surface under the tool. The maximum normalized fluence difference between two simulated tool orientations was 18-21%. These results establish a new simulation framework to enhance our understanding of the impact of specific tool orientations on the fluence delivered to tissue, which has the potential to impact the associated photoacoustic image quality.

Johns Hopkins University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.